Equatorial Bulge – More Nonsense From The Helio-Cultists

in flatearth •  6 years ago 
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  
  ·  6 years ago (edited)

Jeeze, how stupid do you have to be to be a flathead.

Look, the earth spins at a constant rate. Long, long, long ago when the earth was a spinning molten blob, the earth was slightly bulged out at the equator due to the spin. When I say slight, I mean .0017 difference. That is more perfectly round than a billiard's ball. This"bulge" remained as the crust hardened, and it is still here today. It is not bulging as we speak, it is at equilibrium.

Ahhh, more cult parroting. There is actually a simple experiment you can do to prove the equatorial bulge, and IF YOU WERE BEING SCIENTIFIC instead of just being a cult parrot, you'd know how we actually figured out there is an equatorial bulge with a simple, but damned clever experiment, that anyone can do.

Take two identical pendulum clocks and run them at the equator and at another latitude... then explain why one runs slower than the other if the earth is flat and stationary. Good luck proving that it's due to something else other than equatorial bulge... but , being a scientist, you can't just IGNORE this observable, repeatable, measurable, predictable observable reality... and you ARE a scientist... right? LMAO.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equatorial_bulge

And how this experiment was confirmed.

https://books.google.com/books?id=qumVBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA124&lpg=PA124&dq=equatorial+bulge+newton+pendulum+different+lengths&source=bl&ots=7zjqrGj0QJ&sig=CvPXazyIy_HMGmz8lFHYWCaEIFg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjb1JjPmZHbAhUB-J8KHXZfAYAQ6AEIfTAM#v=onepage&q=equatorial%20bulge%20newton%20pendulum%20different%20lengths&f=false

Butthurt_Cream.jpg

kerriknox = uvas or they work together. he was the first person I ran into here on #flatearth on steemit. we 'debated' (he downvoted me for commenting contrary to his suppositions) and he was downvoted by fulltimegeek (he rescued my account that had fallen to a 15), and now apparently he is back.

Hmm, I don't think they are the same troll. But what's for sure, both are addicted to balls. Best way to deal with curverted globecucks like uvass & cherrycocks is to mute them or not give them fodder via honouring them with a response. But I can't help it, sometimes it's too much fun to tease those obelisk (rocket = phallus) worshiping helio-cultists...

oh I engage them to prove they don't have anything to say, they have no proof, they just call names.

You're the one who is butthurt. I gave you 3 experiments you can do that prove you wrong about the distancee to the moon and all you can do is post memes in response! That is a CLASSIC buttf hurt move.

Can you respond to the experiments that I gave you? Of course you can't.

Burden of proof lies upon you. Make the experiment yourself, record it, show me the footage. And don't link me to no wikipedia, OK?

LOL. Shifting the burden of proof. The only option you have since you can't prove the earth is flat! The experiment's been done thousands of times, the burden of proof has already been fulfilled.

Take two identical pendulum clocks and run them at the equator and at another latitude... then explain why one runs slower than the other if the earth is flat and stationary.

any number of explanations could be made about why this is. your supposition that it is as you say, that it would only happen given globe earth, is not one that can be tested.

But we all know you are not going to try to falsify your (failed, falsified, and long put in the grave to decompose) hypothesis. Because flat earthers only allow themselves bias confirmation.. which is why they are flat earthers!

globe earthers ignore

(1) the suez canal being level for 100 miles, connecting two oceans.

why is this bad? because globe earth predicts at least 80 feet of drop.

(2) zooming brings ships back into visibility, fully

this should be obvious, but is constantly being used as 'proof' to those unaware, and even when shown to ball earthers, it is ignored.

I'm pretty sure cherrycocks will come up with a very interesting explanation.

I literally answered every single one of your claims on several different pages with observable, measurable, repeatable, falsifiable, predictable experiments that informed us on why your claim is wrong, and all you can do is to put up memes?

How typical. So, you can't explain why one clock will run slower in the experiment I gave you? Or do you just not care? It seems you are more interested in feeling special by parroting incorrect nonsense than understanding the truth.

You could also try explaining:

Stellar parrallax
The eotvos effect
Why constellations change throughout the year
Why tides reoccur every 24 hours and 50 minutes

But doing so would tax your brain and are impossible on a flat earth so, just like you MUST to be a flat earther, you will ignore observable reality and continue to parrot nonsense.

Screenshot_20180519-083805.png

Ohhh, a meaningless meme. You have to be trolling. No one can be this dumb and unable to discuss a simple topic. The earth is a sphere spinning through space. I gave you several observations that have been repeated countless times that prove it. I'm sorry you are unable to understand anything that debunks your fantasy.

I showed you a 1/2 dozen ways that people have proven the earth moves using simple tests that have been repeated countless times with the same result, and you can do yourself. Your response? Utter nonsense.

The earth is a globe spinning through space. Memes of people adoring corn won't change that.