Not sure if it was a good call, but I can see the intention :)
Congrats on the exit, and whatever the past and deal, I hope you were able to get what you wanted. Are you still one foot in Steem from a non-operational level?
it never was :/ .... it made sense for that tweet tho
If it was never a thing, why should it make sense to tweet that garbage?
I guess it made you look clean, since you "only" addressed the Steemit.com users and that's what you were trying to frame as who the selling of Steemit Inc. would effect, eh?
Truth is, the selling is effecting the whole Steem ecosystem in a huge and possibly also catastrophic way. Thus is would have made sense to address Steemians.
Just go away you fucker. After a year or more you suddenly remembered there is a community to address and communicate with. Go enjoy your millions and have fun but make sure they last you a bit because nobody will want to have any kind of business with you in the future. And you are probably too old to flip burgers on McDonald's.
Of course, Steemitan can be a thing. It just wasn't the correct way to adress those individuals who have been invested on this blockchain for the past years, waiting for SMT & communities. Those aren't Steemitans, they're Steemians.
Fuck off Ned
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Not sure if it was a good call, but I can see the intention :)
Congrats on the exit, and whatever the past and deal, I hope you were able to get what you wanted. Are you still one foot in Steem from a non-operational level?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Your entire stream was snarky. I transcribed the thing... what a joke.
You're not fooling anyone.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If it was never a thing, why should it make sense to tweet that garbage?
I guess it made you look clean, since you "only" addressed the Steemit.com users and that's what you were trying to frame as who the selling of Steemit Inc. would effect, eh?
Truth is, the selling is effecting the whole Steem ecosystem in a huge and possibly also catastrophic way. Thus is would have made sense to address Steemians.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Just go away you fucker. After a year or more you suddenly remembered there is a community to address and communicate with. Go enjoy your millions and have fun but make sure they last you a bit because nobody will want to have any kind of business with you in the future. And you are probably too old to flip burgers on McDonald's.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Of course, Steemitan can be a thing. It just wasn't the correct way to adress those individuals who have been invested on this blockchain for the past years, waiting for SMT & communities. Those aren't Steemitans, they're Steemians.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit