.jpg)
Playing in different terrains or playing one's football career in a particular club has always been a long debate between Ronaldo and Messi. While some argue that playing in different terrains shows a player's confidence in one's ability while some actually believe it doesn't.
A lot of people consider Ronaldo as a better player than Messi simply because he has proven himself in different terrains unlike Messi who has played his whole career at Barcelona yet refuses to ;eave there.
.jpg)
source
In fact, I've heard people saying that Messi knows he's going to flop if he dare moves to other leagues and that's why he has refused to push to try other leagues due to fear of the unknown.
Left for me, I don't really think a player has to move from one club to another to prove himself as a world best, after all, winning awards or being crowned as the king of football is not measured by how a player moves from one clubs to another.
That Ronaldo moved from Manchester United to Real Madrid and then to Juventus does not mean Messi will do the same. You can remain in a club and achieve whatever you want to achieve rather than move around.
Now let me here your opinions in the comment section what you guys think
Moving around does not change or add anything. Is necessary when there's need to do so, thats only when it will change the player's greatness. Players should know when is time to Leave a particular club either prove his greatness or to improve himself. Messi's case is a clear example of one who doesn't need to move anywhere to become great, he is getting better attention in his present club and moving out of his current club might be disastrous to his career.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Great one bro
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit