Nah, not very interested in Popperian falsification. To begin with, I find the frame of bivalent logic too restricting and rather stick to good old Pyrrhonian skepticism.
PS: Pyrrhonian skepticism doubts also the basic proposition of Academic skepticism: "εν οιδα οτι ουδεν οιδα"
Without falsification you got nothing. Indeed, there are things we know, things we think we know, and things we don't know we don't know.
This is why falsification is at most important in every intellectual endeavour
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit