RE: Is There a Limit to Freedom?

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Is There a Limit to Freedom?

in freedom •  5 years ago  (edited)

I call bullshit on this article. Why? It takes the idea of "not imposing on others", which is fine and moral, but then twists it to excuse the violence and oppression of this hoax "pandemic".

It shows no investigation has been done on why the "pandemic" is fabricated, how it connects to 5G, how the deaths and case numbers are falsified, how it's being used as a means of putting people in a state of fear and panic, for psychological and social engineering and manipulation, etcetera.

Do some research and proper investigation, instead of just believing the first thing you hear on the news and succumbing to panic mode. Even if this was an extinction level event, slavery is never a "solution", because a life lived in slavery is not worth living. Freedom is the solution, and virtually all "solutions" that "government" has put forth on any issue, is just plain immoral and ineffective, compared to what most people would come up with, were they to consciously assum personal responsibility for their lives and choices.

What people call "government" is never there to help. It's there to try and fool people into enslaving themselves.

Now, if the "government" (as retarded as a concept as it is, in its inception) just said "hey, this is what we think is the case, and here's what we recommend", but didn't violently seek to impose its decrees on others, that would've been a thing. Instead, you have violence, theft, coercion and deceit even more overtly obvious during these "lockdowns".

Think about what the "lockdowns" entail: You're treating everyone as criminals and basically trying to have them put in house arrest, with no regard for the moral, economical and health implications that implies (which are far worse than this flimsy "virus", supposing that it even exists)... all on the premise that someone "might" have the disease, and "might" pass it on to someone else, who "might" pass it on to another, and so on... who "might" get sick if they're already immune compromised, and "might" die either from or just with it, and not because of it.

It's literally like trying to kidnap, cage or/and murder someone, in order to prevent them from potentially doing that to someone else, at some point in their life.

It's not only hippocritical, but just plain retarded.

How about people instead do their own research, go about their day, take whatever measures they want, while actually respecting other people's freedom to take or not take those measures? That's both moral and far more effective, even if it was an actual "deadly pandemic", which it is definitely not.

Remember...

Nobody and nothing has a higher claim to our lives than we do.

There can be no "chosen" ones. Only we can save ourselves, and only we are responsible for doing so.

Freedom is never given. Freedom is never taken.

I/we are all and always free and freedom, imagination, will and intent... infinity, unlimitedness and veyond... among other things...

What we choose to manifest is always a choice; and the choice is always ours to make.

(I don't agree with a number of things that's said in these interviews, but I find the information pertinent and valuable enough to share. Of course, always question everything, etc, etc.)

https://www.bitchute.com/video/H4W7FwBy0Ukh/ - censored interview, on how numbers are faked and how it's connected to 5G

https://londonreal.tv/digital-freedom-platform-interview-1-dr-rashid-buttar/

https://londonreal.tv/unmasking-the-lies-around-covid-19-facts-vs-fiction-of-the-coronavirus-pandemic/

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!