Your post has more than a 500$ reward, therefore you are still absorbing nearly 30% of the rewards you returned no? Your post has less than 100 words, 4 pictures, and yet it will pay you 1/3 of the rewards you claim to have returned to the pool... Seems contradictory
I assume it will fuel your current endeavors. Such as posting about abuse and reward pool distribution, while many other posts are more relevant to the the bulk of steem's users. With the 550$ you could give 50 minnows a 10$ upvote, broader reward distribution is better for STEEM than flagging and consolidation of wealth.
You ought to consider being more civil in your discourse, it is not a strategy which results in quality...
Flagging is not nearly as effective at rewarding quality as precisely distributed upvotes would. Supporting quality content works better than reducing poor content. An upvote is worth more to a minnow than your downvote means to abusers.
The only thing I see those rewards going toward is your wallet.. What is something worthwhile?
In case you haven't realized, the reward pool is limited. Having someone who easily takes 1-2% of it daily via self-voting is not a good thing. Get a few dozen whales like @haejin, and you will never earn anything unless you have 1 more SP than he does.
Unlike the man in question, @berniesanders actually delegates to projects on the platform. You just can't see it because the SP isn't coming from the account you are replying to.
How will it benifit every Steemian, does it goes to reward pool or becomes dead. Do negative voting helps anyone. I was following you but was forced to unfollow because of negative voting on my comments. If you don't like someone, what you get to irritate his followers.
Your post has more than a 500$ reward, therefore you are still absorbing nearly 30% of the rewards you returned no? Your post has less than 100 words, 4 pictures, and yet it will pay you 1/3 of the rewards you claim to have returned to the pool... Seems contradictory
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
That's because you don't know how the rewards will be used.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I assume it will fuel your current endeavors. Such as posting about abuse and reward pool distribution, while many other posts are more relevant to the the bulk of steem's users. With the 550$ you could give 50 minnows a 10$ upvote, broader reward distribution is better for STEEM than flagging and consolidation of wealth.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Uh, dummy, flagging is the MOST board reward distribution. And again, these rewards will go to something worthwhile.
Learn the platform before you make more stupid comments please.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You ought to consider being more civil in your discourse, it is not a strategy which results in quality...
Flagging is not nearly as effective at rewarding quality as precisely distributed upvotes would. Supporting quality content works better than reducing poor content. An upvote is worth more to a minnow than your downvote means to abusers.
The only thing I see those rewards going toward is your wallet.. What is something worthwhile?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
HAEJIN WASN'T CIVIL WHEN HE HAS DOWNVOTED ALL MY POST THE PAST 4 MONTHS!!!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
How it benefits all this drama people like me please explain
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
In case you haven't realized, the reward pool is limited. Having someone who easily takes 1-2% of it daily via self-voting is not a good thing. Get a few dozen whales like @haejin, and you will never earn anything unless you have 1 more SP than he does.
Unlike the man in question, @berniesanders actually delegates to projects on the platform. You just can't see it because the SP isn't coming from the account you are replying to.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
How will it benifit every Steemian, does it goes to reward pool or becomes dead. Do negative voting helps anyone. I was following you but was forced to unfollow because of negative voting on my comments. If you don't like someone, what you get to irritate his followers.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit