He became a billionaire by building closed source systems. Twitter proved exactly what it is during the election. It matters not whether you like Trump or not, the blatent actions by Twitter show they are no different than the robber barons of a century ago. In fact, all of Big Tech falls into this cateogry.
Back in the late 1880s, early 1900s, those capitalists generated enormous wealthy by creating monopolies which meant they took in most of the money. If a company because too much of a threat, they were wiped out.
Big Tech, including Dorsey, is doing the same thing today. They turn to the government to protect them against any threat. Make no mistake, open source protocols would be a threat to not only Twitter, but the entire centralize social media system. Do you think Zuckerberg and those over at Google are going to allow that to happen?
Of course, there is Wall Street to consider in this. Does anyone believe they are going to give up the revenues that come from "surveillance capitalism" by allowing things to open up? Wall Street is very simple in what they want: profits. Leveraging user data for money is highly profitable.He became a billionaire by building closed source systems. Twitter proved exactly what it is during the election. It matters not whether you like Trump or not, the blatent actions by Twitter show they are no different than the robber barons of a century ago. In fact, all of Big Tech falls into this cateogry.
Back in the late 1880s, early 1900s, those capitalists generated enormous wealthy by creating monopolies which meant they took in most of the money. If a company because too much of a threat, they were wiped out.
Big Tech, including Dorsey, is doing the same thing today. They turn to the government to protect them against any threat. Make no mistake, open source protocols would be a threat to not only Twitter, but the entire centralize social media system. Do you think Zuckerberg and those over at Google are going to allow that to happen?
Of course, there is Wall Street to consider in this. Does anyone believe they are going to give up the revenues that come from "surveillance capitalism" by allowing things to open up? Wall Street is very simple in what they want: profits. Leveraging user data for money is highly profitable.He became a billionaire by building closed source systems. Twitter proved exactly what it is during the election. It matters not whether you like Trump or not, the blatent actions by Twitter show they are no different than the robber barons of a century ago. In fact, all of Big Tech falls into this cateogry.
Back in the late 1880s, early 1900s, those capitalists generated enormous wealthy by creating monopolies which meant they took in most of the money. If a company because too much of a threat, they were wiped out.
Big Tech, including Dorsey, is doing the same thing today. They turn to the government to protect them against any threat. Make no mistake, open source protocols would be a threat to not only Twitter, but the entire centralize social media system. Do you think Zuckerberg and those over at Google are going to allow that to happen?
Of course, there is Wall Street to consider in this. Does anyone believe they are going to give up the revenues that come from "surveillance capitalism" by allowing things to open up? Wall Street is very simple in what they want: profits. Leveraging user data for money is highly profitable.He became a billionaire by building closed source systems. Twitter proved exactly what it is during the election. It matters not whether you like Trump or not, the blatent actions by Twitter show they are no different than the robber barons of a century ago. In fact, all of Big Tech falls into this cateogry.
Back in the late 1880s, early 1900s, those capitalists generated enormous wealthy by creating monopolies which meant they took in most of the money. If a company because too much of a threat, they were wiped out.
Big Tech, including Dorsey, is doing the same thing today. They turn to the government to protect them against any threat. Make no mistake, open source protocols would be a threat to not only Twitter, but the entire centralize social media system. Do you think Zuckerberg and those over at Google are going to allow that to happen?
Of course, there is Wall Street to consider in this. Does anyone believe they are going to give up the revenues that come from "surveillance capitalism" by allowing things to open up? Wall Street is very simple in what they want: profits. Leveraging user data for money is highly profitable.He became a billionaire by building closed source systems. Twitter proved exactly what it is during the election. It matters not whether you like Trump or not, the blatent actions by Twitter show they are no different than the robber barons of a century ago. In fact, all of Big Tech falls into this cateogry.
Back in the late 1880s, early 1900s, those capitalists generated enormous wealthy by creating monopolies which meant they took in most of the money. If a company because too much of a threat, they were wiped out.
Big Tech, including Dorsey, is doing the same thing today. They turn to the government to protect them against any threat. Make no mistake, open source protocols would be a threat to not only Twitter, but the entire centralize social media system. Do you think Zuckerberg and those over at Google are going to allow that to happen?
Of course, there is Wall Street to consider in this. Does anyone believe they are going to give up the revenues that come from "surveillance capitalism" by allowing things to open up? Wall Street is very simple in what they want: profits. Leveraging user data for money is highly profitable.He became a billionaire by building closed source systems. Twitter proved exactly what it is during the election. It matters not whether you like Trump or not, the blatent actions by Twitter show they are no different than the robber barons of a century ago. In fact, all of Big Tech falls into this cateogry.
Back in the late 1880s, early 1900s, those capitalists generated enormous wealthy by creating monopolies which meant they took in most of the money. If a company because too much of a threat, they were wiped out.
Big Tech, including Dorsey, is doing the same thing today. They turn to the government to protect them against any threat. Make no mistake, open source protocols would be a threat to not only Twitter, but the entire centralize social media system. Do you think Zuckerberg and those over at Google are going to allow that to happen?
Of course, there is Wall Street to consider in this. Does anyone believe they are going to give up the revenues that come from "surveillance capitalism" by allowing things to open up? Wall Street is very simple in what they want: profits. Leveraging user data for money is highly profitable.He became a billionaire by building closed source systems. Twitter proved exactly what it is during the election. It matters not whether you like Trump or not, the blatent actions by Twitter show they are no different than the robber barons of a century ago. In fact, all of Big Tech falls into this cateogry.
Back in the late 1880s, early 1900s, those capitalists generated enormous wealthy by creating monopolies which meant they took in most of the money. If a company because too much of a threat, they were wiped out.
Big Tech, including Dorsey, is doing the same thing today. They turn to the government to protect them against any threat. Make no mistake, open source protocols would be a threat to not only Twitter, but the entire centralize social media system. Do you think Zuckerberg and those over at Google are going to allow that to happen?
Of course, there is Wall Street to consider in this. Does anyone believe they are going to give up the revenues that come from "surveillance capitalism" by allowing things to open up? Wall Street is very simple in what they want: profits. Leveraging user data for money is highly profitable.He became a billionaire by building closed source systems. Twitter proved exactly what it is during the election. It matters not whether you like Trump or not, the blatent actions by Twitter show they are no different than the robber barons of a century ago. In fact, all of Big Tech falls into this cateogry.
Back in the late 1880s, early 1900s, those capitalists generated enormous wealthy by creating monopolies which meant they took in most of the money. If a company because too much of a threat, they were wiped out.
Big Tech, including Dorsey, is doing the same thing today. They turn to the government to protect them against any threat. Make no mistake, open source protocols would be a threat to not only Twitter, but the entire centralize social media system. Do you think Zuckerberg and those over at Google are going to allow that to happen?
Of course, there is Wall Street to consider in this. Does anyone believe they are going to give up the revenues that come from "surveillance capitalism" by allowing things to open up? Wall Street is very simple in what they want: profits. Leveraging user data for money is highly profitable.He became a billionaire by building closed source systems. Twitter proved exactly what it is during the election. It matters not whether you like Trump or not, the blatent actions by Twitter show they are no different than the robber barons of a century ago. In fact, all of Big Tech falls into this cateogry.
Back in the late 1880s, early 1900s, those capitalists generated enormous wealthy by creating monopolies which meant they took in most of the money. If a company because too much of a threat, they were wiped out.
Big Tech, including Dorsey, is doing the same thing today. They turn to the government to protect them against any threat. Make no mistake, open source protocols would be a threat to not only Twitter, but the entire centralize social media system. Do you think Zuckerberg and those over at Google are going to allow that to happen?
Of course, there is Wall Street to consider in this. Does anyone believe they are going to give up the revenues that come from "surveillance capitalism" by allowing things to open up? Wall Street is very simple in what they want: profits. Leveraging user data for money is highly profitable.He became a billionaire by building closed source systems. Twitter proved exactly what it is during the election. It matters not whether you like Trump or not, the blatent actions by Twitter show they are no different than the robber barons of a century ago. In fact, all of Big Tech falls into this cateogry.
Back in the late 1880s, early 1900s, those capitalists generated enormous wealthy by creating monopolies which meant they took in most of the money. If a company because too much of a threat, they were wiped out.
Big Tech, including Dorsey, is doing the same thing today. They turn to the government to protect them against any threat. Make no mistake, open source protocols would be a threat to not only Twitter, but the entire centralize social media system. Do you think Zuckerberg and those over at Google are going to allow that to happen?
Of course, there is Wall Street to consider in this. Does anyone believe they are going to give up the revenues that come from "surveillance capitalism" by allowing things to open up? Wall Street is very simple in what they want: profits. Leveraging user data for money is highly profitable.He became a billionaire by building closed source systems. Twitter proved exactly what it is during the election. It matters not whether you like Trump or not, the blatent actions by Twitter show they are no different than the robber barons of a century ago. In fact, all of Big Tech falls into this cateogry.
Back in the late 1880s, early 1900s, those capitalists generated enormous wealthy by creating monopolies which meant they took in most of the money. If a company because too much of a threat, they were wiped out.
Big Tech, including Dorsey, is doing the same thing today. They turn to the government to protect them against any threat. Make no mistake, open source protocols would be a threat to not only Twitter, but the entire centralize social media system. Do you think Zuckerberg and those over at Google are going to allow that to happen?
Of course, there is Wall Street to consider in this. Does anyone believe they are going to give up the revenues that come from "surveillance capitalism" by allowing things to open up? Wall Street is very simple in what they want: profits. Leveraging user data for money is highly profitable.He became a billionaire by building closed source systems. Twitter proved exactly what it is during the election. It matters not whether you like Trump or not, the blatent actions by Twitter show they are no different than the robber barons of a century ago. In fact, all of Big Tech falls into this cateogry.
Back in the late 1880s, early 1900s, those capitalists generated enormous wealthy by creating monopolies which meant they took in most of the money. If a company because too much of a threat, they were wiped out.
Big Tech, including Dorsey, is doing the same thing today. They turn to the government to protect them against any threat. Make no mistake, open source protocols would be a threat to not only Twitter, but the entire centralize social media system. Do you think Zuckerberg and those over at Google are going to allow that to happen?
Of course, there is Wall Street to consider in this. Does anyone believe they are going to give up the revenues that come from "surveillance capitalism" by allowing things to open up? Wall Street is very simple in what they want: profits. Leveraging user data for money is highly profitable.He became a billionaire by building closed source systems. Twitter proved exactly what it is during the election. It matters not whether you like Trump or not, the blatent actions by Twitter show they are no different than the robber barons of a century ago. In fact, all of Big Tech falls into this cateogry.
Back in the late 1880s, early 1900s, those capitalists generated enormous wealthy by creating monopolies which meant they took in most of the money. If a company because too much of a threat, they were wiped out.
Big Tech, including Dorsey, is doing the same thing today. They turn to the government to protect them against any threat. Make no mistake, open source protocols would be a threat to not only Twitter, but the entire centralize social media system. Do you think Zuckerberg and those over at Google are going to allow that to happen?
Of course, there is Wall Street to consider in this. Does anyone believe they are going to give up the revenues that come from "surveillance capitalism" by allowing things to open up? Wall Street is very simple in what they want: profits. Leveraging user data for money is highly profitable.He became a billionaire by building closed source systems. Twitter proved exactly what it is during the election. It matters not whether you like Trump or not, the blatent actions by Twitter show they are no different than the robber barons of a century ago. In fact, all of Big Tech falls into this cateogry.
Back in the late 1880s, early 1900s, those capitalists generated enormous wealthy by creating monopolies which meant they took in most of the money. If a company because too much of a threat, they were wiped out.
Big Tech, including Dorsey, is doing the same thing today. They turn to the government to protect them against any threat. Make no mistake, open source protocols would be a threat to not only Twitter, but the entire centralize social media system. Do you think Zuckerberg and those over at Google are going to allow that to happen?
Of course, there is Wall Street to consider in this. Does anyone believe they are going to give up the revenues that come from "surveillance capitalism" by allowing things to open up? Wall Street is very simple in what they want: profits. Leveraging user data for money is highly profitable.He became a billionaire by building closed source systems. Twitter proved exactly what it is during the election. It matters not whether you like Trump or not, the blatent actions by Twitter show they are no different than the robber barons of a century ago. In fact, all of Big Tech falls into this cateogry.
Back in the late 1880s, early 1900s, those capitalists generated enormous wealthy by creating monopolies which meant they took in most of the money. If a company because too much of a threat, they were wiped out.
Big Tech, including Dorsey, is doing the same thing today. They turn to the government to protect them against any threat. Make no mistake, open source protocols would be a threat to not only Twitter, but the entire centralize social media system. Do you think Zuckerberg and those over at Google are going to allow that to happen?
Of course, there is Wall Street to consider in this. Does anyone believe they are going to give up the revenues that come from "surveillance capitalism" by allowing things to open up? Wall Street is very simple in what they want: profits. Leveraging user data for money is highly profitable.He became a billionaire by building closed source systems. Twitter proved exactly what it is during the election. It matters not whether you like Trump or not, the blatent actions by Twitter show they are no different than the robber barons of a century ago. In fact, all of Big Tech falls into this cateogry.
Back in the late 1880s, early 1900s, those capitalists generated enormous wealthy by creating monopolies which meant they took in most of the money. If a company because too much of a threat, they were wiped out.
Big Tech, including Dorsey, is doing the same thing today. They turn to the government to protect them against any threat. Make no mistake, open source protocols would be a threat to not only Twitter, but the entire centralize social media system. Do you think Zuckerberg and those over at Google are going to allow that to happen?
Of course, there is Wall Street to consider in this. Does anyone believe they are going to give up the revenues that come from "surveillance capitalism" by allowing things to open up? Wall Street is very simple in what they want: profits. Leveraging user data for money is highly profitable.He became a billionaire by building closed source systems. Twitter proved exactly what it is during the election. It matters not whether you like Trump or not, the blatent actions by Twitter show they are no different than the robber barons of a century ago. In fact, all of Big Tech falls into this cateogry.
Back in the late 1880s, early 1900s, those capitalists generated enormous wealthy by creating monopolies which meant they took in most of the money. If a company because too much of a threat, they were wiped out.
Big Tech, including Dorsey, is doing the same thing today. They turn to the government to protect them against any threat. Make no mistake, open source protocols would be a threat to not only Twitter, but the entire centralize social media system. Do you think Zuckerberg and those over at Google are going to allow that to happen?
Of course, there is Wall Street to consider in this. Does anyone believe they are going to give up the revenues that come from "surveillance capitalism" by allowing things to open up? Wall Street is very simple in what they want: profits. Leveraging user data for money is highly profitable.He became a billionaire by building closed source systems. Twitter proved exactly what it is during the election. It matters not whether you like Trump or not, the blatent actions by Twitter show they are no different than the robber barons of a century ago. In fact, all of Big Tech falls into this cateogry.
Back in the late 1880s, early 1900s, those capitalists generated enormous wealthy by creating monopolies which meant they took in most of the money. If a company because too much of a threat, they were wiped out.
Big Tech, including Dorsey, is doing the same thing today. They turn to the government to protect them against any threat. Make no mistake, open source protocols would be a threat to not only Twitter, but the entire centralize social media system. Do you think Zuckerberg and those over at Google are going to allow that to happen?
Of course, there is Wall Street to consider in this. Does anyone believe they are going to give up the revenues that come from "surveillance capitalism" by allowing things to open up? Wall Street is very simple in what they want: profits. Leveraging user data for money is highly profitable.He became a billionaire by building closed source systems. Twitter proved exactly what it is during the election. It matters not whether you like Trump or not, the blatent actions by Twitter show they are no different than the robber barons of a century ago. In fact, all of Big Tech falls into this cateogry.
Back in the late 1880s, early 1900s, those capitalists generated enormous wealthy by creating monopolies which meant they took in most of the money. If a company because too much of a threat, they were wiped out.
Big Tech, including Dorsey, is doing the same thing today. They turn to the government to protect them against any threat. Make no mistake, open source protocols would be a threat to not only Twitter, but the entire centralize social media system. Do you think Zuckerberg and those over at Google are going to allow that to happen?
Of course, there is Wall Street to consider in this. Does anyone believe they are going to give up the revenues that come from "surveillance capitalism" by allowing things to open up? Wall Street is very simple in what they want: profits. Leveraging user data for money is highly profitable.He became a billionaire by building closed source systems. Twitter proved exactly what it is during the election. It matters not whether you like Trump or not, the blatent actions by Twitter show they are no different than the robber barons of a century ago. In fact, all of Big Tech falls into this cateogry.
Back in the late 1880s, early 1900s, those capitalists generated enormous wealthy by creating monopolies which meant they took in most of the money. If a company because too much of a threat, they were wiped out.
Big Tech, including Dorsey, is doing the same thing today. They turn to the government to protect them against any threat. Make no mistake, open source protocols would be a threat to not only Twitter, but the entire centralize social media system. Do you think Zuckerberg and those over at Google are going to allow that to happen?
Of course, there is Wall Street to consider in this. Does anyone believe they are going to give up the revenues that come from "surveillance capitalism" by allowing things to open up? Wall Street is very simple in what they want: profits. Leveraging user data for money is highly profitable.He became a billionaire by building closed source systems. Twitter proved exactly what it is during the election. It matters not whether you like Trump or not, the blatent actions by Twitter show they are no different than the robber barons of a century ago. In fact, all of Big Tech falls into this cateogry.
Back in the late 1880s, early 1900s, those capitalists generated enormous wealthy by creating monopolies which meant they took in most of the money. If a company because too much of a threat, they were wiped out.
Big Tech, including Dorsey, is doing the same thing today. They turn to the government to protect them against any threat. Make no mistake, open source protocols would be a threat to not only Twitter, but the entire centralize social media system. Do you think Zuckerberg and those over at Google are going to allow that to happen?
Of course, there is Wall Street to consider in this. Does anyone believe they are going to give up the revenues that come from "surveillance capitalism" by allowing things to open up? Wall Street is very simple in what they want: profits. Leveraging user data for money is highly profitable.He became a billionaire by building closed source systems. Twitter proved exactly what it is during the election. It matters not whether you like Trump or not, the blatent actions by Twitter show they are no different than the robber barons of a century ago. In fact, all of Big Tech falls into this cateogry.
Back in the late 1880s, early 1900s, those capitalists generated enormous wealthy by creating monopolies which meant they took in most of the money. If a company because too much of a threat, they were wiped out.
Big Tech, including Dorsey, is doing the same thing today. They turn to the government to protect them against any threat. Make no mistake, open source protocols would be a threat to not only Twitter, but the entire centralize social media system. Do you think Zuckerberg and those over at Google are going to allow that to happen?
Of course, there is Wall Street to consider in this. Does anyone believe they are going to give up the revenues that come from "surveillance capitalism" by allowing things to open up? Wall Street is very simple in what they want: profits. Leveraging user data for money is highly profitable.He became a billionaire by building closed source systems. Twitter proved exactly what it is during the election. It matters not whether you like Trump or not, the blatent actions by Twitter show they are no different than the robber barons of a century ago. In fact, all of Big Tech falls into this cateogry.
Back in the late 1880s, early 1900s, those capitalists generated enormous wealthy by creating monopolies which meant they took in most of the money. If a company because too much of a threat, they were wiped out.
Big Tech, including Dorsey, is doing the same thing today. They turn to the government to protect them against any threat. Make no mistake, open source protocols would be a threat to not only Twitter, but the entire centralize social media system. Do you think Zuckerberg and those over at Google are going to allow that to happen?
Of course, there is Wall Street to consider in this. Does anyone believe they are going to give up the revenues that come from "surveillance capitalism" by allowing things to open up? Wall Street is very simple in what they want: profits. Leveraging user data for money is highly profitable.