The Cavendish Experiment (critically lit.)

The Cavendish experiment of which the gravitational constant is derived, here critically questioned by a true mathematician. I think, the gravitation is fake.

by Miles Mathis

[I won't apologize for the length of this paper: many have enjoyed the story. But if you are only interested in equations, skip to the end. There are plenty of hard numbers and lovely equations there, of a sort to satisfy and shock all but the most jaded. But I don't recommend it. The lead-in is not only necessary, it is a great deal of fun, I am told.]

This is another experiment that has been completely misinterpreted by history. Critics of my papers often lead with the argument that famous experiments like this have been repeated thousands of times by professionals and amateurs alike, some of them very smart people. This argument is supposed to imply a sort of statistical power or infallibility by numbers, I suppose. But it should be clear by now that arguments of that sort are astronomically weak. Any one of us, off the top of his head, could list a hundred instances where centuries of very smart people were completely wrong about a given “fact.” Any study of history will show that most people are wrong about most things most of the time. In fact, all people are wrong about most things all the time. Especially as a matter of science or physics, what we don’t know, as a species, outweighs what we do know by an amount that approaches infinity. So it should be no surprise to find that most of what we claim to know is false, or at best incomplete. It should also not surprise us that the smartest people are wrong almost as often as the dullest. Being what we are and where we are, historically, it just so happens that even our brightest people are not that bright. Due to its rarity, every good idea comes as a shock to everyone, even the one who thinks it.

He even brings mathematical proof. So guys who can only convince themselves of mathematics should read on here: