RE: Brainstorming Gridcoinstats Ideas Thread [25 SBD in Bounty]

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Brainstorming Gridcoinstats Ideas Thread [25 SBD in Bounty]

in gridcoinstats •  7 years ago  (edited)

I like gridcoinstats already a lot as well; very informative! But since you wanted some new ideas, I'd suggest to improve the graphs/stats (they are already well made):

  • Interactive graphs; like the ones at boincstats.com [link];
    I often check out the 4th graph to understand how our Team RAC developed over time
    • alternatively: a table of the plotted values
  • Provide a tick box for all graphs that allows to set baselines to 0 (especially Team RAC)
  • A graph that compares the individual Team RACs of all white-listed projects together over time (possibly with a logarithmic y-axis)

What I also miss, but Brain from grcpool implemented already nicely [link]:
... a list that allows to filter interactively white-(& gray)-listed projects by the provided application types (Windows, Linux, GPUs, Android, etc.)

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

A graph that compares the individual Team RACs of all white-listed projects together over time (possibly with a logarithmic y-axis)

The difficulty with this one is that projects hand our RAC at hugely varying rates. I have seen a ten fold difference between projects when switching from Moo Wrapper to SETI.

  ·  7 years ago (edited)

I know, dutch. Currently, the Team RAC even varies by a factor of ~200 and it can vary even more if a new project got white-listed. For this reason I suggested a logarithmic y-axis. I don't know how this would look like with 25+ lines, but it's the only way to compare the temporal evolution of all projects together in one place.

Team RAC even varies by a factor of ~200

I did not even consider that before, but I assume you are meaning between a CPU and a GPU project, correct? Maybe (if that is even feasible) we could get two graphs to compare RAC between projects - one for CPU and one for GPU, with the RAC in each scaled to some baseline.

  • Interactive graphs: In plans. Good suggestion though! Regarding RAC, @dutch has a point. But I could make the graphs so you can see differences in changes per project. Visualizing each project with a line instead of combining them. Combining them wouldn't do much good.
  • Interactive projects list: Nice. Added to the plans for sure. Been working on adding more details about projects, but not the way it was presented.

+1 more visual stats with interaction