I want to have a Discussion about gun violence
Any thoughtful ideas and commments will be paid in SBD
In light of the recent mass shooting in Las Vegas, USA, I wanted to have an open discussion about gun violence in America. After tragic events where many lose their life due to an armed person wanting to inflict harm, social media blows up with Left s Right rhetoric, where the gun debate turns into hostility and nothing is accomplished. In this post I want to start a discussion about whether or not citizens should own firearms, how many, what type, etc and whether there is a solution that we can agree upon for stopping these acts of terror that have seemingly become omnipresent.
Rules - A discussion and debate not an argument - (Thoughtful insight will be paid in SBD)
If you are going to participate in this discussion there are a few rules you must adhere to:
- Constructive ideas
- No name calling of any sort.
- Trying to stick to facts rather than opinions
- Understanding that there is no easy solution.
Some Facts - For
As the second amendment in the United States Constitution reads, Individuals have the right to bear arms for the main purpose of self-defense, oppression and defense of the state. This was originally adopted in 1791 and is one of the fundamental arguing points for pro-gun activists. You can read more on the second amendment here.
There is no question that guns are a big deterrent to would be criminals. Self defense is still the largest part of gun usage in America. If regular citizens are allowed to carry guns they can stop would be attackers before damage is done. An interesting post regarding the public being allowed to carry concealed weapons;
An analysis of the FBI crime statistics found that states that adopted concealed carry laws REDUCED crime
Read more of that article here
The case can be made that we are safer when everyone has access to guns, with thorough background checks, licensing and training. Have a look at American Gun Facts. I have fact checked a few (not all) of these claims and cross referenced their citations. Some are from valid sources while others click to dead links. Either way, before you take my word for it, it's always good to cross reference.
Against
So we have briefly looked at the case FOR guns, now lets do the same AGAINST
America by far and away has the largest number of mass shootings in the world. America also has a very large population, so when adjusting per 100,000 people we still see that America leads the way. America also has by far and away the largest military in the world, perhaps there is a correlation there, but you be the judge. The US also has the highest suicide rate of the top 10 most developed nations and a large majority of these suicides are by gun. Here is the Wikipedia Page, it gives a in depth breakdown of gun violence in America. If you prefer more of a visual, I have linked a video which gives a breakdown of gun violence in the US, I highly recommend watching it. Always remember there are many many statistics that people will throw out and use to argue for and against guns, remember we should always be critical and cross reference everything.
Here we have a simple meme that talks about what happened in Australia after there was a mass shooting years back. It is difficult to compare Australia to the United Sates, just like it is difficult to compare any two nations, but the facts don't lie. Since Australia's action on guns, there hasn't bee a mass shooting since.
Lastly, I have shared a clip from a recent Jimmy Kimmel monologue where he takes about what happened in Las Vegas and the death of many innocent civilians. To quote from his piece:
After reading a lot of the online discussion in the aftermath, many people say this is terrible, but there is nothing we can do about it, but I disagree with that intensely. Of course there is something we can do about it.
Give the video a watch and just listen to his thoughts. Whether you agree with his comedy, his personality or his show is not important here.
So to finish off, no matter which side you support, whether you're black, brown or white, we must come tot the table and discuss the issue at hand and come up with solutions, because one thing I think we can all agree about is that the current situation is not working. I look forward to hearing your thoughts and opinions. Remember, thoughtful comments will earn you SBD
I'm not sure whether taking guns away or not will ever help out saving lives. I don't know if we even take away all the guns if it would even stopped any of the senseless killing of human lives. The day that the calamine shootings took place here in the United States another senseless killing took place over in China a school was also attacked but with a man used a machete. In New York a bomb. It just goea on and on. I think its a humanity thing Iwish people would just love one another and there would be no one or group hurting each other.
I do not have the answer but my thoughts and prays our with you all.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yeah there is violence everywhere in the world, but in the more developed western countries, the US leads the way, and it looks to only be getting worse. For the good oh humanity we really need to think of solutions to this problem
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
My son found a quote that's been circulating: Blaming guns on violence is like blaming spoons on obesity.
Taking away firearms will not stop a criminal from acquiring them, They don't follow the law. A mentally ill person also- just because there is a law on the books will not stop a sick person or a criminal from doing what they want.
Also, think about it- we only hear about the bad. That is how the MSM is set up. We do not hear about the hundreds of lives a day that are saved because of firearms in the hands of law abiding citizens. We do not hear about the toddlers who still have a mom because she carried a pistol legally and defended herself against an attacker. We don't hear about these things.
We only hear of the negatives.
With that being said, I personally do not see why automatic and semi's are needed for "home and personal defense," however in a supposed free country, once the citizens begin allowing the PTB to take "rights" away, it begins a domino effect and pretty soon there are no rights left and really stupid and disgusting things start happening. Look at homeland security.
Someone who is driven to do such horrendous acts will do them no matter what. Cooking meth is illegal but there are recipes and detailed instructions all over the regular, public internet. Just a quick Google search away. And just because the recipes to cook the drug are there for the public to easily access, and the ingredients are made from common household items you can purchase anywhere, does not mean everyone uses them to bake a crack cake. You only hear about the few bad who do, not the millions who don't.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You make some good points.
With regards to the spoon analogy, a spoon is something to help you eat that is what is was designed to do. A gun was designed to shoot/destroy/kill things. That’s it’s purpose. Maybe because guns have become so ubiquitous in American culture, people feel the need to have them for “protection”.
You’re right about the stories we don’t hear though, obviously the media will not report on that, and yes law abidingcitizen with carry and conceal firearms can definitely help out in a dire situation. Personally, I don’t see the need to go to Walmart to buy some things and bring a gun with me, that thought has never even crossed my mind.
There will always be criminals breaking the laws and it’s no different with obtaining guns, but what if the government were to buy back guns and amunitions and have them destroyed? With less and less out there on the market would how would you feel?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Regarding the spoon analogy: sure, spoons were made for eating. But they're also handy tools for the act of shooting drugs ;) Humans, as well as many creatures, devise ways to use things not as they were intended all the time.
The government would have to cause an economic crisis to justify a gun buy back at this point. But things would be so shaky I don't think it would work. If things got that bad even people who are against guns would be clamoring on the black market. In a case such as that, crime will rise dramatically, and people will need to defend themselves as even now there's nowhere near enough law enforcement officials to make a difference in the event of something big.
My thinking behind that?
Why was the food stamp program developed? The ptb realized a hungry man is a desperate man. Who will do anything... In cases of economic crisis, or just uncertain times in general, people have less faith in their government.
If that were the case with less and less on the legal market, there would be more and more on the black market. And I would feel fear. And I do not feel fear now. And I say this as a mom who's son- also on Steemit :)- was in a school shooting a couple years ago..
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yes people can take any good invention and make it into something destructive, we have seen this throughout history, but a guns sole purpose is destruction. When guns are so easily accessible what is to stop someone who feels bullied, depressed, angry at their spouse, pissed off at the driver in front of them or any other number of reasons from committing a heinous act with a gun?
Who do you need protection from? Aren't the police supposed to do that, or is there absolutely no faith left in the system/government? I have traveled to numerous countries where firearms are both legal and illegal, but only in America have I seen people so proud to be a gun owner. Maybe it has just be ingrained in the media and education system.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
There was a crazed man living on my property that I live on with my kids. Just three weekends ago the police told me there's nothing they can do but ticket him.. Three police men. The man had been living on my property. He started a fire in me and my neighbor's property three weekends ago.
The officers told me I can use a gun in this situation, because there's nothing they can do.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I don't understand exactly how the laws work everywhere, but trespassing is a criminal offence where I am from. I don't understand how there is nothing the police can do.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hi! Perspective from an Aussie who does not own a gun....To see people die at the hands of maniacs with guns is truly horrifying and I am in no way trying to downplay the gravity of recent events, however... I think an important point that needs to be addressed, yet seems to consistently being overlooked is the fact that the recent events in Vegas were carried out using guns with ILLEGAL modifications, so technically his guns weren't legal anyway. Does anybody actually think he gave two shits about that? So had guns been illegal altogether would it have really made a difference?
The other point, and I believe this is by far the more important of the two is protection against oppressive regimes. Now this might stir people up a little but I venture to say that the more than 100 million people that were murdered in the last century under marxist dictators internationally far outweighs the number of deaths by insane, lone gunmen...That's not even to mention any other forms of oppressive government (that's JUST Marxism).
I understand these are heavy discussions that do need to be had, but if I were in the US, I would be far more concerned about the dangerous people who want to take your guns than the chance you might get shot by a crazy person and to be REALLY real, from an international perspective I believe that the power that (those who want to take the guns) would gain from that would also have severe implications on a global scale. Perhaps that is a slightly selfish perspective but to a degree I almost feel like the US citizens are a sort of "last line defence" against a truly oppressive globalist movement that is just waiting in the wing for it's chance to strike...
My 2c.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I'm a legal citizen of the US with dual citizenship with Italia. I lost nothing if the US removed firearms.
But any government who wishes to remove something which a countryman has is scary indeed.
What other rights will tptb be terminating?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yeah there is no easy answer and you’re right about oppressive regimes, whether it’s the current North Korea dilemma to stalin’s Russia or Ceausescu in Romania, when the state has too much power, the people are in trouble. And with the amount of guns/tanks/drones/weapons the American government has, it can be very difficult to convince any citizen to give up his arms. But this is at least a discussion that needs to be had
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It certainly doesn't need to be had:
This discussion is prompted by the Acts of a Deranged man who sought to commit a massacre.
We are discussing Guns in the context of "Should they be allowed?" ONLY because that happened. It's a pseudo discussion at that because everyone understand that nobody can and should bear a consequences of the acts of this mad man, and those that are victims to his act need to blame the problematic "Gun Free" zone that creates such a tantalizing target for these mad men and the lack of protection in these vulnerable places.
If he did it with a bomb this conversation wouldn't happen, regardless of gun free zones or not as nobody can protect against such a suicidal mad man, and if he did it with a bulldozer, equally this would not be a discussion we would be having as would be the case for anything other than a Legal (not lawful) firearm.
The American Government is not a Democracy, here the 51% DON'T vote to eat the other 49% for dinner, and the majority has made it's voice heard on matters of "Mob Rules/Democracy" which are interchangeable terms because Democracy is only the appearance of Legitimate, but it could never amount to actual Lawful Governance which relies all on the Consent of the people, who clearly Do Not Consent by the fact that 2/3 aren't even registered to vote! What you call American Government should never be called so as it's fundamentally not what the American Government guaranteed to Americans is or has ever been.
In light of that, North Korea is more Lawful than what you purport as American Government and there is a reason this Unlawful Corporation is going after North Korea after gifting them the only type of Nuclear Reactor that could be used to produce weapons grade plutonium, and it's akin to the snobby rich kid PLANTing his stuff in the poor kids hands and then crying "thief", unfortunately the world is waking up, and this causes the rich kid to profess even more loudly "THIEF", but all the world hears is a snobby rich kid making dubious allegations which doesn't bode well with the little runt.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
No pressure or anything guys haha..
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I wish I would see more people voicing this. I think a lot of people feel this way, but either can't or for whatever reason don' voice these opinions. I'm hoping to get an article out on this later today if you'd like to check it out.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Will do man! Let me know when you post it and I'll come have a look, I'm following you now but my feed tends to get so full of crap that I just head straight to the "political" feed now anyways :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
https://steemit.com/guns/@mattclarke/this-is-what-you-sound-like
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I agree with much of what you said, however, I do have to mention a few things. 1 the "bump stocks" are a 100% legal modification. 2 they, along with the 100 round surefire magazines mitigated the carnage. both are gimmicks, useful only for seoerating the gullible from their money. both features increase the frequency of jams, which the shooter compensated for by having more rifles available. on the subject of oppressive regimes, in ...I believe it was 1938, Adolph Hitler prohibited Jews from owning firearms. much easier to load people in boxcars when they arent armed
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
love this @jasonshick thanks for inducing the conversation. I think my biggest desire before getting into gun violence is just the desire to not harden my heart toward anyone dying regardless of the size. All of these deaths are people with families and friends that have to deal with the repercussions.
In regards to solutions - the problem is not guns. The problem is people. Trying to restrict people from being murderes is great. But I do not think guns are the problem. Sure we could increase our regulation on getting access to guns, which I believe would help to a degree. However people willing to murder people is the problem.
Trying to address that problem is massive, and our responsibility, and has to be looked at systematically in our culture. Guns are the symptoms.
One of the solutions that I would propose is a government that holds firm and somewhat harshly the enforcement of laws - to all people regardless of race, cultural background, and economic state. The government is not responsible to be merciful, thats individual peoples responsibility.
I think a look into Saudi Arabia's enforcement of their laws would help.
*I do not agree with Saudi Arabian laws - rather their enforcement of their laws is the point on want to make!
For example, if you smuggle drugs into Saudi Arabia they kill you.
harsh? effective?
you can read more about Saudi Arabia law for yourself and their enforcement of their law yourself...here is some light reading
http://www.vocativ.com/underworld/crime/saudi-arabia-execution-beheading/index.html
The problem is the US government becoming social justice police
the role of the government is to protect it's citizens, not be merciful. The role of our community is to come around people and help them, get them resources, express empathy and mercy.
Not the government.
I think the US government needs to up its enforcement of its law's, and in some ways develop harsher punishments.
I think it would at least put more ownership of the problem on local communities and not on the government. The problem with these mass shootings I do not believe is guns. I believe its much bigger then that.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Some interesting points you make here. It is a very difficult subject and like you said guns may just be a symptom and not the root problem. When there are so may factors involved it is difficult to single out just one as the main cause for the problem.
With regards to the strictness and severity. When people are afraid of the consequences for committing a certain crime they are definitely less likely to commit that crime. Like the Saudi example, If one or two examples are made then the public will learn that the government is not playing around. However, the same law exists in Thailand where trafficking drugs is punishable by death, but because of corruption, drug traffickers can usually pay of police and continue on.
Communities is an interesting point. When people are more tied to their community, crime is more likely to go down because of the strong social fabric. I think this might be the most telling point. When people don't feel isolated, they are less likely to commit heinous acts.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
My perception - which could be wrong is that my millennial generation feels like they are activist because of social media but in reality do close to nothing in their actual local community. Instead they are looking to federal government to take on their value system. Which is not the governments job.
I think the Saudi argument is incredibly extreme - the point being our government's role is to just enforce the law. I think if local people in local communities actually engaged their community like they engage on social media, corruption in politics would begin to get addressed, racial stigmas would start to fall apart, local business' would thrive and people would be unable to get to the point of lunacy as we have experienced here with Las Vegas. This takes time, patience, and individuals steeping to the plate.
I hope to keep that trend moving in Fort Collins Co...
Really appreciate this dialogue -
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
We have a Certain Guarantee against Cruel and Unusual Punishment and the American People are both Merciful and forgiving as our past has shown and as the current actions of those that represent Lawful Governance by Consent AND inheritage have so nobly demonstrated, and as this is a Government of the People by the People and for the People, indeed this Government is one much more of mercy and JUST(appropriate)ICE and not one of INJUSTICE, IMMORALITY, or HARSHNESS which are the platitudes of the Intolerant, the Indiferent and those without Sensibility or the wisdom of man's imperfection, and as such only goes to deprive those who committed harm of any and all atonement, drives sentiments of Equal Quality as Injustice, Immorality and Harshness of the Law from the guilty and harboring them on their fellow man, harboring the very acid to forgiveness and hardly in the sentiment of restitution.
The US Government doesn't have enough enforcement? It needs to make more examples, to victimize more people and to imposes harsher stricter licenses, because saudi arabia has the brutality of someone that exhibits zero empathy or sympathy to those that err?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Controversial topic Jason. I think it's important as an American to not give up any of our rights. Even if the argument is " for our own protection". I think that the gun violence is a symptom of the problem, not an actual gun problem. One thing that cannot be denied is that we have a greed and corruption problem here in America. On another note , we simply do not do a good enough job taking care of our mentally ill. It takes a mentally ill person to commit mass homicide. If we address the root causes we can solve the symptom related problems
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think that is a great idea. The mentally ill need to receive better treatment for sure. When people have physical injuries they go to the doctor right away. But when people have a mental injury the stigma associated with it keeps a lot of people from seeking proper help. This needs to change.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
As a Canadian I know that we have stricter Gun Laws and there seems to be less gun violence but as we see lately there are many modes of destruction and the automobile is becoming the weapon of choice. Anything can become "weaponized" so we need to get to the Root cause of this violence. What could possibly inspire a human being to cause such destruction. Why are people doing this ? Obviously they have no respect for human Life or any life or anything and there must be something done in Society to teach people that this One and Only Life is precious. Whether you are Religious or Atheist you must come to realize that this Life is a gift (from God or the Universe) to be respected. Less guns may prevent some deaths but if Humans have no respect for Human Life then this problem will only grow worse.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yeah, What happened out West was terrible and you are right that if people want to cause harm to others they will definitely find a means of doing it. I think social ties and a sense of community goes a long way to preventing these occurrences. When someone feels isolated and alone with nothing left to lose, then it is much easier for them to commit these heinous acts. That being said a gun is designed to destroy/kill/inflict damage, that is its purpose whereas a car is a method of transportation. People using spoon or car analogies and comparing them to guns are missing the point of what a gun is and was made for doing.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Don't get me wrong. Guns are designed to kill quickly and machine guns are designed to kill many people very quicky. My point is that the mind set that allows one human being to kill another human is the problem here.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yeah we can definitely agree on that. I just think that if we make it more difficult for people with these intention to get their hands on these weapons, the public's overall well being will go up
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
No they aren't missing any points:
Guns are made to Destroy/Kill/Inflict Damage so that when someone decides to Destroy/Kill/Inflict Damage they can do so Effortleslly. It works both ways: The ones that was to Destroy will be met with their own Destruction by equally proficient tools as theirs.
The caveat is that should people wish to act in that way therefore people can appropriately respond. It's you who I think doesn't understand what guns are designed to do. Guns are designed as the Proper Means to Eliminate or Neutralize Threats. Therefore Guns are Designed to Protect Life.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The bill of rights was amended to the Constitution for the united States and among the enumerated Rights, the right to own guns was largely for National Security, in the sense that should anyone try to mess with Virginia, the Virginians could easily gather up and create a militia of the people by the people for the people, it was not about directly Defending Yourself because you inherently couldn't make any argument about Gun Control during those times, 100 years previously it was a Given that people have that right, but it was/is Explicitly about Defending against Oppression as it enunciates:
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
The main, primary, chief purpose is For the Security of a Free State.
Any pandering to the contrary or insinuation that this right doesn't guarantee the people to keep Nukes or Integrally Silenced Weapons, or any other "Illegal" weapon and anything and everything that could be construed as a weapon and utilized for the purpose explicitly stated in the Simple, Straight Forward, Statement that was Ratified to the Constitution, when it explicitly states that "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed as a well regulated militia is necessary to the security of a free state.", is erroneous and without reason because this was explicitly a guarantee Against Federal Regulations and even above that because this is a Right owed to the people, and not to Federal Employees, nor US Citizens, nor any other Foreign Agents and the people, as in Virginian, Nevadian, etc, only they can ratify such Rights, as it was The People that the Constitution is for, and it's the People that have not Recognized any such Dual Citizenship, and no oath of office stands as valid To the People, For the People have only One Constitution, and it's Titled: The Constitution for the united States of America for a reason, and not The Constitution of the United States which is a Corporate Charter and denotes both citizens and Persons, one Title of Servitude and one a Straw Man Corporate Fiction, Purely for Fraudulent Purposes of Defrauding Americans, through the Semantic Deceit of the sound-alike Constitutions, and imposing the Color of the Law, where a crime is wrangled into Legalese Legislation and nothing is permitted without permits and everything is stipulated if you contract with the permit issuers, in so much as making you a subject, and this is done under the Appearance of Law (that is why all it takes is the Appearance of Justice) and as such NO US Congress is a Continental Congress and no Mere Corporate Sound-Alike charter is our Lawful Government, I am no Citizen and no Servant to the State and I am my own man and I do not recognize any authority of man over me and the Government of the People guarantees me nothing if there are no People to be present and accounted for at Roll Call, but those words are speaking in the Context of Defending oneself implicit in the predecessor English Bill of Rights, and in this context it is refined by Expressing the need of a militia for the security of a Free State, which is exactly why we have no more freedoms but only Equal Civil Liberties, and why these mass shootings are not the subject of Security of a Free State, but the subject of detective (NOT-PO-LICE) work and inquiry, and a crime of people and not an act of States which a militia is concerned with.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Okay, some of what you're saying is a little over my head but let me see if I understand what you're saying. The original constitution that was made to protect the people of America no longer does what it was set out to do? You see yourself identifying more as an individual rather than a citizen and you also identify more within your state than the actual whole of America?
I do see your point with invalid legislation being made by people who do not represent their people properly. I have always had a problem with many laws that have been enacted by the few as they really don't help out the "people" the government would have you believe.
But back to the gun issue, you see it more as a necessity against the state? how do we prevent these mass shootings where many innocent people lose their lives?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You cannot prevent mass shootings as much as you cannot prevent people murdering people en mass with any other things, cars, poison, microwaves, electricity etc.
How do we prevent assholes like that one that killed all those people?
A well armed society is a polite society.
What has happened is that ever since the Civil War, which was neither declared nor marked as concluded by the signing of a peace treaty, is that the Federal Government has been working in a Private Capacity and hasn't taken the Oath to the Constitution but to the Corporate Charter that was enacted in 1868, which parrots the actual Constitution.
http://presscore.ca/two-constitutions-in-the-united-states-1st-was-illegally-suspended-in-favor-of-a-vatican-crown-corporation-in-1871
Back to the point I was making, the original Bill of Rights that the Protestants won from the King, ensured that people have a right to bear arms for their defense. The Bill of Rights which was added years after the Constitution was first finalized (which goes to show that the document wasn't "for the people of America", as some of the language explicitly states by excluding Slaves, and Natives from the political process and it took some years to tack on the Bill of Rights which secures our freedoms on paper/principle) was amended in a time where you would have been seen as a LUNATIC to even mention Gun Control and the reason for our Second Amendment Right being worded as it is, was to Record that the people have the right to Band Together in order for the security of a Free State.
The conversation about the Legitimacy of the US Congress and the lack of quorum for over one and a half centuries precludes all other issues of "government", without that most critical and important of fact I will not participate, as 2/3's of people who aren't Registered to Vote equally express their choice of not participating, in The Majority Voting to Eat the Minority for Dinner. Mob Rule is amoral, it's as if people truly have no sense of right and wrong. And this is evident because the Majority Vote to NOT-VOTE, and then how is that DEMOCRACY?!
the 12% vote to eat the rest for dinnerthe ones that conspire make all the rules, absurdity.Nobody can "PREVENT" anything. Nobody can Guarantee Tomorrow (hence why contracts cannot exist in a rational society, SMART or otherwise)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
We cannot prevent things like the rain, we can however prevent mass shootings. I refuse to believe otherwise. If we couldnt prevent them then mass shootings would be a worldwide epidemic and not just a mostly american problem.
If the the most lethal weapon on the market is a hunting rifle or a pistol, that is a large step towards preventing a mass shooting
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Reality doesn't rest on your refusal.
Who is preventing Mass Shootings? Norway? Can any people that gather prevent against one sicko?
The legal market. Because the market is indeed not under ANYONE'S THUMB, and certainly not because some assholes that don't even have the credentials to be public officials claim otherwise. If the most lethal weapon on the market was a machete, someone would still have a gun, with magnet, or someone could melt styrofoam in gasoline and make a 55 gallon drum and with a nice pump and some sweet nozels make a napalm gun that could touch everything and anything in 100 ft. They could remote control cars through crowds, they could implement a remote control car with napalm gun, they could do this without anything but Basic everyday things.
Prevent that.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Maybe it is just the American culture that has become this way
Does this happen in developed nations?
How do you explain the case of Australia after it's mass shooting in 1996 and subsequent ban on long guns? There has not been a single mass shooting since. That sounds to me like the Australian government took preventative measures.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Why are you asking if it happens in developed nations? As if crazy people CAN be prevented from doing CRAZY things by words on a piece of paper! Wait, it's indeed crazy to be compelled by WORDS on a piece of paper:
Good men don't need laws and Evil man will act regardless of the law.
People have improvised their Spree Killing, hardly anything has changed, those that are easy victims still fall prey because guns are villainized, which means only those with guns (aka a police who goes rogue, a military armorer going bonkers) can do so.
Preventive measures would be arming everyone to the teeth and educating everyone in their use, but the only thing that you'll be preventing is 99% of crime and without that what good are cops and armies.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Because supposedly America is a developed nation. You are talking about anarchy and things out of fictional tales.
Right, Australia still has problems, but what they don't have is a gun problem and that is the issue at hand in this discussion.
Do you really think that arming everyone to the teeth would create a peaceful and working society? DO you think you'd feel safe walking around at night knowing everyone is packing weapons in their pants. Do you think that countries where citizens don't own weapons are living in a police state?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I don't own a gun or ever really care to. The problem I see is... what would happen if you ban guns and the only people left carrying them are the Govt/Military and those who disregard the 'laws' anyways? Make things better or safer for whom? The politicians? Guns are not the problem, a tyrannical government with TOTAL control of it's unarmed citizens would be a BIG PROBLEM!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think it would only be a problem if the government did not have its citizens best interest in mind. From the responses I've received on this thread, it seems like most people feel like the United States government does not care at all about its people and guns are a kind of last line of defense. There are many countries in the world where military and the police are the overwhelming majority of weapon holders and these countries do not have the issues that America is facing. One question for you, if no one had a gun versus everyone having a gun, in which scenario would you feel safer?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Framing the question around a mood-check, of how the current population feels about the imagined trustworthiness of the government of the day, to determine whether or not citizens should be able to defend themselves against the possibility of a government takeover, is like a council deciding whether or not to fund a fire department based on the average temperature of everyone's air-conditioned homes at this moment.
The first thing that happens when a government gets out of control in abusing a minority population, is that the international community seeks to send arms to that minority.
That is the kind of foresight that the 2nd Amendment represents.
It's only a ridiculous doomsday scenario to people who ignore the news and history.
That political situation has repeated itself throughout history, from as far back as the Israelites wanting to leave Egypt, the American Colonialists wanting to leave England, down to Catalonia (on the news today) fighting to leave Spain.
It is that reliable a prediction that even within America itself there was a Civil War, and, if not for the fact that the South wanted to take hostages who would be denied human rights as a premise of that new, separate nation's laws and culture, I don't know that the North would have won or even objected.
As a celebrated television producer once said through a character the the TV show he produced:
"Man only has the rights he can defend."
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This unfortunately appears to be the case.
I would prefer no one to have a gun vs everyone, any day!
I'm not saying the Las Vegas event wasn't real or people didn't die or get hurt. Just check out this list and see if anything fits. 11 signs of a False Flag
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I don't think there will be one idea that can solve it, but maybe there are some that can make it less likely to happen.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I completely agree with getting rid of auto and seim-automatic weapons, absolutely no need for them. a pistol or two should be more than enough "protection". I think the GPS tracking is good in theory but people would likely rip out the tracker. I like your ideas though
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
None of these work.
If the official story were true, (In Las Vegas) the lone gunman would have killed more people if he had a bolt action rifle. With an automatic weapon and the distances, he was just spraying bullets all over the place. It was just luck that they hit anybody.
Now, the hotel / casino has metal detectors and security. How did one person get so much guns and ammunition up to his room? He would have had to make a dozen trips, and had his car packed to the roof. (but I digress)
There is more than one type of gun sport. Skeet, deer hunting, pheasant hunting, shooting competitions. Anyone who loves guns, and gun sports, has a half a dozen guns just by having one of each type. Limiting someone to one is just... you might as well say none.
Basically, everything BUT a bolt action rifle is a semi-automatic. So, you just decided to ban 95% of what is currently in a gun shop.
GPS tracking would only affect law abiding citizens. Bad guys would get around the system.
And like I said before, this guy made a dozen trips to his car, in a hotel full of security. GPS would not have helped.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Never surrender your rights especially when the government is lying to you about what really happened. They have other motivations and governments with an unarmed public have killed more people than all wars combined.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I understand where you are coming from here, but this doesn't really address the question I posed in this post. How can we stop these mass shootings in the future and what can we do about the mass shooting problem that we currently face.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Jimmy Kimmel really doesnt know what he is talking about nor does he seem to truly care in a way that he should. He has armed security detail and increased it recently, He doesnt know the difference between semi auto and fully auto guns as this guy had a bump stock with a semi auto and anyways you cant stop evil from truly attacking when you have Europe wanting to rid of guns then knife attacks go up it wouldnt be wise to get rid of guns though what we should do is give out better knowledge on guns and teach people actual facts about them.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think education about weapons is very important, more knowledge is definitely better for the general public. I don't know about Jimmy's personal life, but as a celebrity with this opinion on guns he has made himself a target and I can therefor understand his increased security detail. But he was not lying about the senators who voted against closing the loopholes on background checks. I thin the NRA and big gun money plans a huge factor in what laws get passed as well
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
My gut feeling is that no major changes will be made any time soon, if only because Republicans currently have a lock on the House of Representatives in large part due to successful gerrymandering. Perhaps SCOTUS will shake things up with a ruling on Gill v. Whitford that makes partisan gerrymandering more difficult, but I wouldn't count on it.
But, even more than a Republican vs. Democrat issue, it's a rural vs. urban issue. Might future demographic trends favor one side of the issue over the other?
I'm not sure that citing the Constitution is as powerful as some might think. After all, the Fourth Amendment is still nominally a part of the Constitution, but the Patriot Act and other legislation have rendered the Fourth all but moot. Something analogous might happen at some point in the future with firearms legislation, but not with the current Congress.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I don't think much will happen either, but I still think we should have a discussion about it. Left vs right has created huge rifts in society, so much so that even if you agree with something that the other side says, you cant actually agree with them, because it goes against your party and there is too much social pressure to do that. I think the media and government have done a great job at dividing its citizens so that almost nothing gets accomplished. I've never really considered the rural vs urban idea, what exactly do you mean by it?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Urban areas tend towards voting Democratic and rural areas tend towards voting Republican. But there are some exceptions suggestive of the urban/rural split on guns that I'm alluding to. Northeastern Minnesota for instance has only one place that could be considered urban (Duluth) but the region as a whole has a long tradition of voting Democratic and a strong gun culture with many hunters. Democratic-voting union members who go off into the woods on the weekend in search of a 12-point buck.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Ahh I see what you mean. I think we need to establish more than a 2 party system going forward as it shouldnt just be one or the other. This may have had success in the past, but in the 21st century this division is pushing people further apart on almost every political issue, with neither side wanting to compromise. If there were a 3rd or 4th party that took ideals from both parties I think that could be a starting point. Do you think something more than the 2 party system will ever see the light of day?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I would like to see that, ideally along with ranked choice voting. But it's been a long time since a third party has been been successful at a national level. And that was the Republicans supplanting the Whigs. George Wallace picked up five states, the Bull Moose Party was really just Teddy, a few Socialists in Congress way back when, but that's about it.
I suppose that a Greater Depression might yield a new strong party of the extreme Left or Right, but what we could really use would be a centrist party. I am having a hard time seeing that happen any time soon though.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Can we agree to that? Gun murders in the US have been in steady decline for decades and are at the lowest point they have been in over 20 years. Why change what is working?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Mass murders have been on an incline for years, something is not working.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
How do you suppose to stop mass murders? They still happen you know, without guns.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The shooting In Las Vegas was perpetrated by the the Rothschild Banking Cartel with help from Sheldon Adelson and Michael Chertoff, this Is a Zionist run operation. Yes Shadow Government, Rothschild's and Deep State deliberate killing of Americans just like what happened on 911, where the Shadow Government and Israel conspired to massacre 2900 Americans. The only way Americans will keep any semblance of freedom, Is to maintain all their rights specifically the 2nd Amendment and to make sure they keep Semi Automatic Rifles. The only way to keep your freedom against a completely controlled and corrupt government Is to be armed.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
In situations such as Las Vegas, no amount of concealed or open carried firearms would have made much difference. A rapidly fired weapon from a higher vantage point with a clear view of the crowd has a clear advantage over 600+ people firing blindly at a casino/hotel.
That said, I am not opposed to firearms, but I would like for their to be some mandated training and maybe stricter background checks. I don't know that these will do anything to stop angry people from doing terrible things, or if we even CAN stop that, so I guess I am among those who just want SOMETHING to be done. I generally keep my thoughts to myself on this, though, as I don't see it being helpful, just adding to the noise.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
When 600 People you're firing on turn around and shot back, you hardly will be acquiring targets and engaging but GTFO or making yourself THE-TARGET ready to be lit up by everyone the moment someone locates the obvious bright muzzle flash and relays "third window, second floor" and 600 pairs of eyes won't be long, after all everyone is aiming down the barrel of their gun.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Seeing people walking around city streets with guns designed for a war zone seems crazy to me. I believe that guns are not the real problem but the sense of fear and violence that the US government has instilled in it's people.
When you have a government who resolves nearly all its issues with its neighbours through violence it becomes understandable that its citizens will start to do the same. And having such powerful weapons freely available makes the problem bigger.
Its like the cold war with it's mutual assured destruction (MAD), an arms race of people trying to prove who has the biggest penis.
On a glib note maybe bullets could be banned. The people can keep their guns and the senseless killing will be greatly reduced.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Excellent!! I love this. I take it you like guns? :)
Upvoted and Resteemed!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Actually if I had to take a stance I would say I am against guns. But I do understand how people feel about the second amendment and their right as citizens to bear arms. I’m Canadian, and I have never thought about purchasing a firearm, but that’s just me
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Pull up some statistics about Chicago, which has some of the strictest gun laws in the US. I here on the radio of people getting killed all the time due to gun violence.
So tell me again how outlawing guns prevents gun violence. I understand there are exceptions to the rules and not all places that ban guns have problems with shootings (Australia for example), but I would rather have the choice of owning a gun in case I ever need to stand up for my beliefs.
In full disclosure even though I believe in the right to have guns I own no guns.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
We have plenty of shootings; the drug gangs and bikers have guns, and use them to kill each other.
We tend not to have random sprees though, probably because culturally we're not as desperate to be famous.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The guns are already out there on the street, Trying to enforce laws especially in an area heavily run by gangs is not going to produce desired results. I don't think the solution is to simply outlaw guns. I just think that a reduction in automatic/semi-automatic weaponry, a limit on how many guns and ammunition a person can own etc would do a lot of good. A simple supply demand function as an analogy, If bullets cost $1000 a piece because of the scarcity less people would be loading up on ammo. A government that is so heavily invested in military spending and its own weaponry is going to have a hard time convincing its people to give up arms, but there needs to be some dialogue on ways to stop these needless deaths.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Some great points. Not only is our military so heavily geared, but they're now giving surplus military equipment to police. I would say if the police are allowed to have/use than I am within my right to have something equally as powerful as them to protect myself and my family from corruption.
I don't like limits or reductions genrally as a law. They make poor laws and here's why. What makes a weapon a semi-automatic/automatic weapon by definition? Where do you draw that line and who decides. Same goes with ammunition, how much is too much? What's too much to me who owns no guns maybe different from recreational shooters or hunters.
Look at what happened when they tried to ban alcohol. I don't understand why people think banning guns will be different.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Solodad: Take a look at my "replies" to see the points and systems. I put forward to Canadian Firearm owners.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@jasonshick got you a $9.04 (5.0%) @minnowbooster upgoat, nice! (Image: pixabay.com)
Want a boost? Click here to read more about @minnowbooster!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The @OriginalWorks bot has determined this post by @jasonshick to be original material and upvoted it!
To call @OriginalWorks, simply reply to any post with @originalworks or !originalworks in your message!
To enter this post into the daily RESTEEM contest, upvote this comment! The user with the most upvotes on their @OriginalWorks comment will win!
For more information, Click Here! || Click here to participate in the @OriginalWorks writing contest!
Special thanks to @reggaemuffin for being a supporter! Vote him as a witness to help make Steemit a better place!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This post has received a 25.42 % upvote from @boomerang thanks to: @jasonshick
@boomerang distributes 100% of the SBD and up to 80% of the Curation Rewards to STEEM POWER Delegators. If you want to bid for votes or want to delegate SP please read the @boomerang whitepaper.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
My favorite response to this is you can ban guns but you ultimately enable bad people real criminals to have them through the black market. Then you createed the scenario where I tweeted this out last week good article well-informed resteemed and upvoted! Thank you for your generosity cheers!
https://twitter.com/An0nKn0wledge/status/915994789299945472
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This post has received a 14.87 % upvote from @buildawhale thanks to: @jasonshick. Send at least 0.50 SBD to @buildawhale with a post link in the memo field for a portion of the next vote.
To support our curation initiative, please vote on my owner, @themarkymark, as a Steem Witness
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This wonderful post has received a bellyrub 3.83 % upvote from @bellyrub thanks to this cool cat: @jasonshick. My pops @zeartul is one of your top steemit witness, if you like my bellyrubs please go vote for him, if you love what he is doing vote for this comment as well.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This post has received a 7.69 % upvote from @booster thanks to: @jasonshick.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Congratulations! This post has been upvoted from the communal account, @minnowsupport, by miami (jasonshick) from the Minnow Support Project. It's a witness project run by aggroed, ausbitbank, teamsteem, theprophet0, someguy123, neoxian, followbtcnews/crimsonclad, and netuoso. The goal is to help Steemit grow by supporting Minnows and creating a social network. Please find us in the Peace, Abundance, and Liberty Network (PALnet) Discord Channel. It's a completely public and open space to all members of the Steemit community who voluntarily choose to be there.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
As simple as that, weapons are supposed to be used for both self-defence and leisure. Of course there will be aggressors or perpetrators around, so you'll definitely want to have a gun to defend yourself.
It's all about self-defence and to mitigate an aggression, whether it's from the State or a person, your odds raise considerably if you can fight toe-to-toe against an aggressor.
Instead of your life being in the hands of the other person, which has the powers of judge and executioner, your life will rely in your own actions.
Which one is better? In my opinion, the latter, undoubtedly.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
your post starts with a false premise. The primary purpose of firearms is to place citizens on an equal footing with government forces. and the founders felt so strongly about that that they stated "the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed". every single word of gun control legislation is illegal."but the courts ruled.." the SCOTUS once ruled that it was legal to own human beings. "but convicted felons..." fine, I'll concede that a man or woman in prison cant bring their guns with them, they have to wait until they are released. "but insane people..." we cant take guns away from Democrats either.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
No, this is where you're mistaken. The primary purpose of firearms never was or is to make citizens equal with government forces, you're deluding yourself by thinking so. Guns are made to destroy things, humans being included. I could care less If legislation passes about gun control in America. You yankees will keep going on killing each other. You are one of the most divided nations in the world, the current state of your politics just further proves this. This left vs right nonsense becomes more laughable by the day. You would rather nothing getting accomplished than see the other side have success. A sad state of affairs
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
yet with all our terrible problems, people from all over the world still want to come here. now picture, if you will a pretty young lady, 5'5", 120 pounds or so walking along the street. now picture, hell, lets say a guy my size, 5'10", 180 pounds. and this brute intends to rape her. its late, deserted area. what are her chances of stopping him? depends, in some place like England? she's gonna die probably. here? depends on the laws where she is. in my state? dude is gonna catch a couple to the chest
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The media plays a large part in that. Personally, I ave been to america over 50 times and I would NEVER live there. Why on earth do people have to come up with these outlandish situations? Is there a chance that a young woman walking down the street is going to be raped in America? Is this the reality you live in? This tells me everything I need to know. Most incarcerated nation for a reason. A powerhouse on the verge of imploding. More worried about being shot by your neighbour than Kim Jong eun launching a missile at you. America needs to get it s shit together and not addressing the gun problem is just another reason that its on the demise
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
now see, you claim to want a discussion about guns, and then instead start bashing your betters. since Im certain you dont actually live in middle earth,and you referred to Americans as yanks, I'm going to assume you're a limey.
therefore, you live in a country where you have been forced to abdicate your defense toyour Masters, but still live in the most violent country in europe. I guess if you've been raised licking boots, you just get used to the taste, and being totally unable to defend your life and family,you just hope the Master keeps them safe,and allows you to continue bei g a good little subject. in your last response, you attempted to mock our political situation. however, lets face reality. the only reason you know about it, is because you live in a second rate country. hell, I dont know who runs the show in your country, whether you have a pope,or a duke,or whatever,because it doesnt matter to me. but our politics? they affect the entire world. hell,our Navy's army has the 5th largest airforce on the planet, and we're supposed to care what begger nations think? dream on.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Boom! Dangle a little bait and the fish come in to eat it up. Couldn’t have been any more wrong on all your assessments.
Look at when this post was made and look at the amount of discussion that went on.
Second, I’m not from England, but it doesn’t surprise me that you know nothing about the country, typical American who doesn’t get out of his own town.
You think having a big navy and army’s makes you a great nation? That’s laughable. All you’re guns aren’t going to save you from implosion. It’s amazing that in the 21st century you are still under the impression that you need a gun to keep you safe and that those who don’t have guns are hoping that the ‘masters’ keep them safe. Hope you eventually come out into the world and stop living under that rock
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
LMAO, I swear, this is like playing chess with a pigeon. you have no idea what the pices are, how they are supposed to be moved, but you think you are clever. lets review 1 you cant answer simple questions. 2 you pretend rape and other violent crimes don't occur in "middle earth". 3 you assume I haven't travelled extensively (more than 50 countries on 6 continents,boy did you blow that one!) 4 you're still a hoplophobe, that doesn't understand guns well enough to discuss them at any level. now, your original post was in response to the Vegas shooting,which was certainly a tragedy. however, I'm quite frankly glad of a few key facts, that you never considered,because you never realized.
1 the guys tactics sucked. in discussions with other veterans, the consensus was, with what was available to the shooter, anyone that actually knew what he was doing could have doubled the casualties.
2 dude owned a plane, and that concert was right next to an airport. if you think 58 dead was bad,Google "Oklahoma Federal building bombing" and try to wrap your head around a Cesna loaded up with fuel oil and fertilizer plowing into 20,000 people.
now, onto your latest post. having a large military isnt what makrs us a great country, but, again, it insures that the rest of the world does watch us, amazingly closely. because face it, if we get annoyed with your little country,we can demolish it. and theres not a damn thing you can do to stop us. now, you (unwittingly to be sure) made the point for gun ownership, and contradicted yourself in 2 sentences. "all your guns aren't going to save you from implosion"
gasp oh my Gods, you mean you think we might suffer a societal collapse?? well, who would keep my wife and kids safe from the mindless zombies and liberals whos welfare checks didnt arrive?? damn, guess I would have to.
here in the states, we have a saying. "when seconds count, police are only minutes away". the average violent encounter is over in less than 30 seconds. average police response time varies wildly, but the BEST Ive found is in the 4.5 minute range. the response time in my home is 1200 feet per second,the velocity of 9mm +P hollowpoints
hopefully you can get a glass navel, and see the real world around you
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Keep living in your fantasy world. There is 0% chance that you have been to 50 countries across the world. With an attitude like yours its more like 50 meters from your parents house.
How do I know this? Because I myself am a traveler, having been to numerous countries in Europe and Asia, and I have had thousands of conversations with people across the world.
One thing I've learned about people (especially Americans) who travel, is they realize that the world is a big beautiful place and the gun touting fanatics usually haven't ventured beyond their town border. While you keep living in fear of your neighbors and whether your weapon cabinet will keep you safe, I am going to go on and keep living and enjoying my life. You can keep your gun paranoia to yourself.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
좋은 게시물
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit