Hmmm...So I wonder why they didn't just do that...?
RE: Real World cost from the Hard Fork 2.whatever!
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Real World cost from the Hard Fork 2.whatever!
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
They did Not think of it I suspect. This is a planning failure, and is why those who write software need others involved in the planning process.
When you plan in isolation, with only those who solve everything by a software patch, more obvious ways to get the same results are sometimes missed. Software repairs can be more complex than simple changes that could get the same results.
>:(Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Well said. I remain hopeful, though, that they have the long-term best interests of all Steemians in mind, not just those of the whales.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think they are trying, they just planned in a vacuum and didn't capture all the real world problems. Now they are trying to address them without another hard fork change.
I just hope the include all the new input they have received in any new solution they work up. They surely understand that whales can't live without plankton....
:)Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit