RE: Planned Obsolescence

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Planned Obsolescence

in hardware •  8 years ago 

One of the first items with planned disintegration was the light bulb.

About 100 years ago some business man decided more money by making products that fail over time . . .

Consider this light bulb . . .

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/a13220/the-worlds-longest-burning-light-bulb-has-shone-for-110-years-17441176/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centennial_Light

now-a-days washing machines, fridges etc are all designed to fail after so many preplanned hours of use.

This auto destruction is seven years based upon the average number of hours of normal useage.

That is why buying extra product protection is wasting money, the product has such a low chance of failing you are simply giving your money away . . .

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

With the light bulb, there was a industry cartel.

In a perfect market situation, the "planned disintegration" doesn't quite make sense. If you buy an item from brand A and it breaks after X years (and the customer would have expected it to last for longer), then the customer is likely to chose brand B when buying the replacement.

Of course, the "perfect market" doesn't exist. I've been having massive problems with leaky water tanks in my boat, it really doesn't make sense but I keep on buying exactly the same brand, in the short term it seems easier for me to just replace the faulty parts with replacements that fits in with the least amount of work.