Hi @andres9019,
I really appreciate your comment and your point of view. Thanks for taking the time to write such a detailed comment, it shows you care about and have put thought into the subject of vaccines. I can't say I disagree with you because you say more information and longer trials are needed. That's what I believe, too. A higher level of investigation into vaccines is simply what humanity deserves.
What I am finding to be true is there are two ways of looking at vaccines. One: administer them because we think they will do more good than harm, and two: we don't know what we don't know...it's better to be safe than sorry and forego vaccines until we do have all the information. The massive scale vaccines are being used warrants a massive investigation into them... I think that's fair to say. But there is no incentive to reveal negative effects of vaccines because they are so profitable.
Overall, yes, statistically the chances of having a bad outcome from Gardasil are low but that doesn't give me confidence in it. I am also concerned about other aspects of the vaccine such as its use of aluminum. Aluminum is a known neurotoxin, and this exposure is something that raises flags to me.
@nataliejohnson thank you. As you say, vaccines are very profitable in public health, but there are some concerns about its use. I would like to tell people is 100% safe, but in medicine nothing is for 100% sure. So more controlled trials are needed to prove people that sciencists behind vaccines are making the best effort for public health. Thank you for your respectful post, greetings from Colombia.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit