In @midnight-g's original post, she claims that
Dr. Harper said that while Gardasil and Cervarix are marketed to protect against cervical cancer, the claim has not been proven and is hypothetical.
Until a transcript from that "recent" speech from 2009 or some other evidence materialises that backs up this claim, it is safe to assume that this is just made up and that Dr. Harper holds no such position at all.
It is also safe to assume that any party who wished to truthfully investigate this would not, somehow, miss Dr. Harper's peer-reviewed article Next Generation Cancer Protection: The Bivalent HPV Vaccine for Females (2012) where she explicitly states that Cervarix is an excellent choice of vaccination:
Should vaccination be an option that women choose for their cervical cancer protection, Cervarix is an excellent choice for both screened and unscreened populations due to its long-lasting protection, its broad protection for at least five oncogenic HPV types, the potential to use only one-dose for the same level of protection, and its safety.
Why did you leave this out of your review of Dr. Harper's view on HPV vaccination? You don't think your readers deserved to know this part?
@midnight-g, I understand that your post was probably not guided by malice, but what you are doing here could cause real harm to people. Think about that for a moment.
You should read more into the side effects of this vaccines . Lot of girls had die and numerous had become sterile after getting this shot. Dr. Harper was harrased by big Pharma for her findings and claims, of course she had to said this. I'm sure she's concern about her life.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit