RE: The discovery of Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter - part 9 (end)

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

The discovery of Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter - part 9 (end)

in history •  7 years ago  (edited)

Awesome! thanks for looking over some of these ideas. As for why I bring up the green excitation, I remember listening to an Eric Dollard lecture from his "Power of Aether" series and had a small segment on some interesting findings from his 'cosmic induction generator' experiments where he would stick an exhausted bulb in between the strong field of two resonator coils pointing inwards, effectively representing two giant capacitor plates of strong potentials. So I did a quick transcription;

“...You start to get spectral colors that don’t seem to be involved with whatever materials are inside the bulb, and I learned that when running this that there would be a green glow that appears when you use very short impulses of real high intensity, and it doesn’t go away when you turn off the power quickly, and I learned that it is the spectral color of the aether gas that Mandeleave called coronium, which I believe is a thousand times lighter than hydrogen and its theorized that is what the aether could be. You’re starting to see some of that in this bulb here…”

![Image of Eric Dollard's Coronium]
()


Wiki Quote:
*Coronium, also called newtonium, was the name of a suggested chemical element, hypothesised in the 19th century. The name, inspired by the solar corona, was given by A. Gruenwald in 1887.[1] A new atomic thin green line in the solar corona was then considered to be emitted a new element unlike anything else seen under laboratory conditions. Because of this it was also mis-classified as Iron Line Number 1474.[2]

During the total solar eclipse of 7 August 1869, a green emission line of wavelength 530.3 nm was independently observed by Charles Augustus Young (1834–1908) and William Harkness (1837–1903) in the coronal spectrum. Since this line did not correspond to that of any known material, it was proposed that it was due to an unknown element, provisionally named coronium.

In 1902, in an attempt at a chemical conception of the aether, the Russian chemist and chemical educator Dmitri Mendeleev hypothesized that there existed two inert chemical elements of lesser atomic weight than hydrogen. Of these two, he thought the lighter to be an all-penetrating, all-pervasive gas, and the slightly heavier one to be coronium. Later he renamed coronium as newtonium.[3]

It was not until the 1930s that Walter Grotrian and Bengt Edlén discovered that the spectral line at 530.3 nm was due to highly ionized iron (Fe13+); other unusual lines in the coronal spectrum were also caused by highly charged ions, such as nickel, the high ionization being due to the extreme temperature of the solar corona.[4]*

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronium

![Image of Coronium]
()

https://sunearthday.nasa.gov/2006/locations/coronium.php


As far as adding to the Bremsstrahlung concept, Dollard said this pretty much immediately after;

“…What they were trying to do when studying Newton, who was a very devout alchemist, I don’t know why he didn’t die of mercury poisoning, he virtually bathed in it. The idea was that mercury had this power to be transformed into some kind of ultimate reagent. Which would work upon other elements in some way. Thats about the best I can say of it. but it popped up later with a medical doctor with the name of Gustave Le Bon who wrote two books that hit physics on the head with an iron baseball bat. and it involved the theory that matter spontaneously disassociated, and that is what radioactivity was before atomic energy was such a thing. Le Bon described the forces coming out of the mass ejections & the radiations couldn’t be accounted for and he was told that he was an idiot. Low and behold, now the whole world worships atomic power… his theory was that this atomic power was going on all the time in small and large locations & forms & wasn’t necessarily a process of thermodynamics. At the end of his book “The evolution of matter” (1907), he has an interesting basic experiment, he found that if you take aluminum and you submerge it in mercury, a violent chemical reaction occurs from the exploding hydrogen gas, and the aluminum is consumed… I never learned that in electrolysis school. So that is what alchemy is really about, and that is a very dominant element in what came out of the renaissance…”

I personally have not done much research yet on these new names my self, but It brought up a bunch of new literature to add to this topic. Perhaps you could gleam something from these names here?

Also I super apologize for this/these long comment section posts, but I feel like it is of importance for the topics at hand.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Interesting thoughts! I must admit. However, I found that in trying to understand Tesla's work reading theories by other people (including Dollard) has never helped me. On the contrary they are more likely to confuse and send you off on a different path. I want to stick with Tesla's work until I understand it in all its details because I think it is fairly complete and covers much more than just simple electrical effects.

Yes! It is your diligence to the primary sources is to why I keep bugging you. Im just glad to be able to run the occasional thought by you for clarity.

At the end of your 'Magnifying Transmitter - part 3' article, you spend some time identifying quotes / thought experiments on the physical description of the medium / molecule / ether. I am going to go back and more scrupulously study the details here, for I know I don't have a complete understanding here, but I do know that this area is of huge significance.

Some interesting things im hanging on to;

-Measuring / illustrating /isolating the difference between the incompressible Medium #1 and the particulate substantive Medium #2.
-The measuring of this particulate Medium #2? 2.09374·10-26 g/ml. I would love to know the details of this experiment, because I think Im confused on what it is he is measuring... The vacuum?
-& The presence of Longitudinal up to 1MHz (suggesting that the air / medium is saturating?)

I am hoping that you will shed more light onto these subjects due to its prime importance with all that is here... especially for the sake of illustrations :D

In the lectures Tesla gave from 1891-1893 he explains in quite some detail the experiments he did that led him to believe that there is this second medium. As for the density, I don't know how he determined it, he only supplies the outcome. And finally the changing from longitudinal to transverse is a thought that Tesla played with (he mentions it in the above mentioned lectures). Normally a gas will only pass longitudinal waves and a solid only transverse. But who is to say that this remains the same over the entire frequency range. It makes sense to assume that at a certain point the gas molecules can no longer keep up and the gas starts to behave like a solid allowing only for transverse waves.

Excellent! Thanks for the pointers. Im now re-reading those lectures with now closer attention. Trying hard to not skip any lines this time :) & redrawing the described experiments as I go.

As for thinking about the Bremsstrahlung, I had an interesting thought experiment for visualizing the breaking radiation surrounding an object that is being bombarded. Hopefully in attempts of leaving the electron bullet and marble visualizations for something more fluidic / pressure /polarized in relation.
I was goofing around with this simulator:
http://www.falstad.com/emwave2/
While thinking about some descriptions for Bremsstrahlung:


And thought there were some interesting things to consider when playing with the frequency in relation to the size of the reflective or higher density object and what does it do to the space surrounding it etc..

Image of polarizations

I know this may deviate a bit from writings of Tesla, but this is me trying to simplify & analogize the Bremsstrahlung idea you brought up a few times. What do you think?
-----Also P.S.-----
I noticed that you may be missing some patents in your patent list pdf that were from Great Britain & Canada. I was trying to do some research on air compression and vacua and came across a patent that was unfamiliar to me in your list.
http://www.nuenergy.org/tesla-patents/
Intensional?