SEC-S17/W2 | Layer-3 blockchain // Blockchain de capa 3

layer-3 blockchain refers to a blockchain protocol or network that operates on top of existing layer-1 and layer-2 blockchains. It typically aims to provide additional functionalities, scalability solutions, or interoperability features. These can include things like smart contract capabilities, decentralized applications (DApps), or cross-chain communication protocols.

Describe the architecture of layer 3 blockchains specialized in fractal scalability, highlighting the main components and mechanisms that achieve this objective. Create a chart that illustrates this architecture.

Layer 3 blockchains specialized in fractal scalability typically employ a hierarchical structure with multiple layers of interconnected networks. At the core of this architecture are three main components: the base layer, the intermediate layer, and the application layer.

Base Layer:

This is the foundational layer of the blockchain network, responsible for consensus mechanisms, security, and maintaining the main ledger. It typically utilizes a highly secure and efficient consensus algorithm such as proof of stake (PoS) or delegated proof of stake (DPoS). The base layer ensures the overall integrity and security of the blockchain network.

Intermediate Layer: This layer acts as a bridge between the base layer and the application layer. Its primary function is to handle transaction processing and validation at scale. To achieve fractal scalability, the intermediate layer employs sharding techniques, where the network is divided into smaller, more manageable subsets called shards. Each shard operates semi-autonomously, processing a subset of transactions while still being interconnected with the rest of the network. This allows for parallel transaction processing and significantly increases the throughput of the blockchain network.

Application Layer:

This layer is where decentralized applications (DApps) and smart contracts reside. It provides the interface for developers to build and deploy their applications on the blockchain network. The application layer leverages the scalability provided by the intermediate layer to support a wide range of use cases and decentralized services.

In addition to these core components, layer 3 blockchains specialized in fractal scalability incorporate mechanisms such as:

Dynamic Shard Adjustment:

The network dynamically adjusts the number and size of shards based on demand and network conditions, ensuring optimal resource utilization and scalability.
Cross-Shard Communication: Mechanisms are implemented to facilitate communication and interoperability between different shards, allowing for seamless interaction between decentralized applications and transactions across the network.
Hierarchical Structure: The architecture is designed in a hierarchical manner, with each layer building upon the capabilities of the layer below it. This allows for modular scalability and efficient resource allocation.

Governance Mechanisms:

Robust governance mechanisms are implemented to ensure the integrity, security, and evolution of the network over time, including mechanisms for protocol upgrades, dispute resolution, and consensus rule changes.
Here's a simplified chart illustrating the architecture:

   +------------------+
   | Application Layer|
   +------------------+
             |
   +------------------+
   | Intermediate Layer|
   +------------------+
             |
   +------------------+
   |   Base Layer     |
   +------------------+

This hierarchical structure allows for efficient scalability while maintaining security and decentralization.

How do layer 3 blockchains specializing in fractal scalability use horizontal sharding to improve transaction processing capacity, and how does this differ from the Steem blockchain approach?

Layer 3 blockchains that specialize in fractal scalability typically use horizontal sharding to partition the network into smaller, more manageable pieces called shards. Each shard operates independently, processing a subset of transactions. This approach improves transaction processing capacity by allowing multiple shards to process transactions concurrently, thereby increasing overall throughput.

The difference from the Steem blockchain approach lies in the implementation of horizontal sharding. While both approaches aim to improve scalability, the specifics of how they shard the network and handle transaction processing can vary significantly. Steem primarily uses a delegated proof-of-stake (DPoS) consensus mechanism, where a fixed number of block producers validate transactions for the entire network. In contrast, layer 3 blockchains specializing in fractal scalability may use more sophisticated sharding techniques, such as dynamic sharding or adaptive partitioning, to dynamically adjust shard sizes based on network demand and activity levels. Additionally, the consensus mechanism and incentive structures may differ between these blockchains, affecting how transactions are processed and validated within each shard.

Explain how sidechains and rollups are essential elements of layer 3 blockchains to ensure fractal scalability, and how these concepts could be applied to the Steem blockchain to improve its performance

Sidechains and rollups are crucial components of layer 3 blockchains because they help achieve fractal scalability by offloading transactions from the main chain to secondary chains or layers.

Sidechains allow for parallel processing of transactions by creating separate chains that are interoperable with the main chain. This reduces congestion on the main chain and improves overall scalability. Rollups, on the other hand, bundle multiple transactions into a single transaction, reducing the number of on-chain operations and thus increasing throughput.

Applying these concepts to the Steem blockchain could improve its performance by alleviating congestion and reducing transaction costs. For example, implementing sidechains could allow for the execution of smart contracts or other complex operations off the main chain, while rollups could bundle numerous Steem transactions into a single transaction, decreasing the burden on the main chain and improving overall efficiency. This would enhance the user experience and make the platform more scalable for future growth.

How do Layer 3 blockchains handle the challenges of decentralized governance while maintaining fractal scalability, and how does this compare to the governance structure of the Steem blockchain?

Layer 3 blockchains typically handle decentralized governance by implementing mechanisms such as liquid democracy, quadratic voting, or token-weighted decision-making. These systems aim to ensure fair participation and representation while allowing for efficient decision-making. Fractal scalability is achieved through techniques like sharding, which enables parallel processing of transactions across multiple chains or shards.

Comparing this to the governance structure of the Steem blockchain, Steem relies heavily on stake-weighted voting, where stakeholders can vote for witnesses who validate transactions and contribute to network governance. However, Steem has faced criticism for its perceived centralization of power among a few large stakeholders and the potential for vote manipulation. Layer 3 blockchains often strive to address these issues by introducing more sophisticated governance models that prioritize decentralization and inclusivity.

How could the introduction of new technologies such as sharding and interoperable blockchains influence the future of layer 3 blockchains specialized in fractal scalability, and how could the Steem blockchain adapt to these developments?

The introduction of sharding and interoperable blockchains could greatly enhance the scalability and interoperability of layer 3 blockchains, making them more efficient and versatile. In this context, Steem could adapt by exploring ways to integrate these technologies to improve its scalability and interoperability, potentially enhancing its ecosystem and attracting more users and developers. Additionally, Steem could focus on optimizing its infrastructure to leverage these advancements effectively, ensuring its relevance and competitiveness in the evolving blockchain landscape.

@wirngo @sahmie @drqamu @yancar

The Best: Regards:💗
@abdulhakeem786💥