Thank you, @imohmitch, for publishing an article using our tag #dynamicdevs-s22w1. We have assessed your article and present the results of the evaluation below.
| Criteria | Remark |
|---|---|
| #steemexclusive | ✅ |
| Free of Plagiarism | ✅ |
| AI Article | ✅ Original (Human text!) |
| Bot free | ✅ |
Task 1 (1.5/2)
- The explanation of JDK, JRE, and JVM was well-structured and included a creative analogy with a chef and kitchen tools, which made the concept more relatable.
- The graphic illustration was helpful but lacked technical depth and could have been more detailed.
Task 2 (2/2)
- The step-by-step guide for installing JDK and Eclipse was clear and included relevant screenshots.
- The instructions were easy to follow and met all requirements.
Task 3 (0.9/1)
- The program
Sum.javato calculate the sum of the first 100 integers was implemented correctly. - The second program,
Sum2.java, demonstrated the use of a separate function but lacked detailed explanations of the code logic.
Task 4 (0.9/1)
- The tax calculation program
Tax.javawas completed and functional, producing the correct output. - However, the explanation of the implementation and logic for handling tax brackets was minimal.
Task 5 (1.7/2)
- The
Conversion.javaprogram met the requirements for converting uppercase to lowercase, lowercase to uppercase, and handling non-letter inputs. - Additional comments or explanations about the logic could have improved clarity.
Task 6 (1.0/2)
- The
ArrayOperations.javaprogram partially fulfilled the requirements, including finding the largest element, calculating the sum, and sorting the array. - The lack of detailed explanations and the absence of clear implementation for handling operations through separate functions reduced the score.
Comment/Recommendation
Your submission demonstrated a solid understanding of Java basics and a creative approach to explaining concepts. However, there is room for improvement in providing detailed explanations and ensuring the implementation matches the task requirements, especially for exercises requiring modular functions.
Final Score:
Total | 7.0/10
Note: Consider providing more detailed code analysis and modular implementations for future submissions.