The mystery of perceptual intuition has to do with the transient and contingent nature of its presentation, and ultimately with the invisibility of the absolute transcendent.
This is also the ineffable nature of inspiration. The established knowledge is actually related to the paths of sensual intuition, and these paths have historically been meditation, yoga, etc. Based on the experience of the existence of human inspiration established by these perceptual paths, there is corresponding knowledge.
The problem is how the perceptual intuitive paths themselves may be ambiguous, and how the corresponding experiential knowledge is plural and unrealistically communicated, i.e., the established knowledge is imperfect. This also means that the confirmation of knowledge through the path of perceptual intuition is impossible, fundamentally because it cannot establish a universal fact.
In fact, inspiration exists because of the existence of the Absolute Transcendent, that is, the Absolute Transcendent is the cause of the existence of inspiration. In other words, the Absolute Transcendent is the cause of the One, and the causal relationship between the Absolute Transcendent and the One is the knowledge of inspiration.
In philosophy, the Absolute Transcendent is called the First Cause. It is necessary to realize that inspiration can be confirmed only when the Absolute Transcendent First Cause is confirmed.
Although the perceptual path also gives the concept of the first cause - Being, the Word, the "own eternal" One and Brahman in philosophy and religion - it cannot be universally understood, because it cannot provide universal facts. This means that to confirm the universal knowledge of inspiration is only possible from art.
Let's look at the motivation of artistic expression. Everyone is capable of having inspiration, and thus everyone has had artistic expression. Although one does not necessarily engage in artistic expression in a state of inspiration, artistic expression exists universally.
One engages in artistic expression because one acquires a specific experience in the inspired state that distinguishes one from the non-inspired state, and this experience is transcendence, which can also be expressed as the overcoming of nothingness.
Of course, man is not able to make a clear judgment about this transcendence due to the lack of corresponding knowledge, but man can experience it. This experience is crucial because it allows man to unintentionally perceive another existence of himself different from nothingness, and it is this different existence that motivates artistic expression.
At the same time, art exists only if it succeeds in expressing the "oneness" of the different - the transcendent - and the primary value of art lies in the fact that it provides this experience of transcendence.
Moreover, the success of artistic expression is rare, which brings us to the question of the technique of artistic expression, i.e. how the technique holds the transcendence of inspiration.