All of them support the idea of taking advantage of the crisis to make deep structural changes in the economy and society in order to address what they say are long-term challenges, such as climate change, inequality and the loss of biodiversity, however , has also been the subject of criticism that suggests that behind this initiative there is some interest seeking to impose global control.
Those who defined the great reset as a financial crisis that will erase the majority of financial assets are already beginning to talk about a scenario where due to the instability of the debt the banks will close their doors and when they reopen the economy as we know it will have changed drastically, that is what they defend, pensions and stocks will disappear and cash balances will become digital dollars, digital euros, I don't know, digital pesos or any other digital thing called CBDC.
All with a single fractional value of the original according to Roger Web, promoter of the analytical evolution of this idea about a secret agenda called, as I have told you, the Great Taking, the laws are being adapted and put in place to make all this legal and possible people like Peter Schift who is known for being critical of the monetary policies of central banks and a defender of Gold, like many others.
They have described the great theory of the Great Reset in a negative way, in some analyzes they talk about what this new economic and world order would mean, some of them affirm that what is coming is not only a global economic restructuring, but a takeover of assets large scale designed to transfer ownership from the majority to a financial elite.
It is based on the famous “you will have nothing and you will be happy”, the design of a world where property and capital are very difficult to achieve, but in exchange and to reassure people, they will be given the ability to use everything. everything and as long as they need it without being owners in any case.
Those most critical of the hypothetical new order assure that the final design is to make us users of everything and owners of nothing, to prepare against that gloomy future since some of these analysts advise diversification of assets, completely rethinking our relationship with money and with one's own investment.
In a world where the value of money could be questioned, bank deposits in traditional banks do not make much sense and they recommend acquiring tangible assets, placing them in other types of banks, securities for example with stable behavior for decades, also owning bitcoin, making work money in small but very diverse bands and all of this relates to real properties.
