RE: Should Full Minion Lines be MANDATORY

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Should Full Minion Lines be MANDATORY

in hive-135459 •  4 years ago 

For rush...

I think with sufficiently low minion blanket cost decreases, you can create a 'smooth looking' system where a 0 cost unit is actually something so powerful that it sucks to leave a hole in your army at 0 cost (unlike now, where not playing a minion does not have an especially high opportunity cost sacrifice). Rush builds don't even care about most of their minions anyway, if it's as slow as a Militia or Pawn it's just going to sit there for most of the game.

CEO also has these minions that are arguably 'well priced' for their cost (Phantasm, Ghost) but in reality have bad synergy with rush (even Ghost++ has mediocre synergy, being slow) and so they're priced maybe around normally for a regular build, but are basically upfront costs to play rush.

For fast development...

Blank units are really fun for fast development, I've done it for Minotaur & Behemoth synergy. This does have the risk of empowering White's initiative even more.

If you made a piece that said "ethereal on turns 1-3" this would make it more suited for fast development instead of rush (which wants to keep its ethereal threat), but it's no perfect solution. Maybe "can only be moved through but not attacked through".


I think the game is ultimately healthier by forcing all minion slots to be occupied. This is another inelegant looking solution, and I do think being able to run blank slots are somewhat interesting, but it significantly buffs rush.

Also if you think of a blank slot as a minion, you have roughly the same number of potential armies (objectively, not competitively) if you disallowed blank slots and added 1 new low cost minion.

One thing everyone is missing about how TOTSTCEO deals with rush as well (BECAUSE OF YOU RYAN) is not mentioning Outcast pieces, which are 3rd row army slots. I think this can really slow down rush strategies, usually the best way (in CEO) to counter one with an average army is just to put lots of blockers at the diagonal. Normally it still sucks to play against if you have a high-mobility unit pinned and that can't get out the normal way due to the pin, but having a third row thing blocking the diagonal on turn 0 is really great against that. (Also a better solution than getting hard-countered by Favor Chess Cliffs, which screws over the attacker too much IMO.)

btw ryan isnt dark horse ur favrite piece in favuor chess, flight is gud mechanic

-main_gi

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

ethereal on turns 1-3

"can be moved through but not attacked through"

These are both interesting ideas. Not sure I would go as far as changing ghosts into either of them, but they could definitely be used for something. for example, the illusionist is (eventually) supposed leave an illusion behind every time he teleports, which are kinda harmless for obvious reasons, but if they blocked ally movement it would be silly and if they don't block enemy units then it's kinda pointless, so there is some idea of conditional transparency where illusions block only the enemy and that is one of their primary purposes - I think other conditional transparency effects could be used for similar things.

It should be noted that for a rush setup when using bishops you can get around the early rush cost by using a dove instead of a ghost, instead of being transparent, it just moves out of the way on its own

Yeah! Actually there's more ways to 'bypass' it:

  • You can also swap something with Apprentice, which points two Bishops attacking t1.
  • You can use Harpy+++ and push a strong attacking minion out, like Spearman.
  • You can use a minion that naturally has fast movement that can get into attacking range like Fireball+++, but usually this isn't very cost effective.

-main_gi