RE: 科比坠机,能有多少人记得他所陪伴的二女儿——13岁的Gianna?

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

科比坠机,能有多少人记得他所陪伴的二女儿——13岁的Gianna?

in hive-143316 •  5 years ago 

hi,guy ,
I can't see the original source link you gave me at all. I don't know if it's blocked by china GFW or deleted. Please leave me a screenshot of the original.

My post is based on the information of the news report and personal opinions. If there are similarities, it is also a miracle.

In addition, we can't use discord at all. Discord doesn't support proxy, and even if the whole OS sets up proxy to log in to discord, it will be mistaken as a robot.

Please provide better communication channels such as telegram! Thank you

中文版本

我根本就看不到你给的原文链接,不知道是被屏蔽了,还是被删除了.麻烦把原文截图留言给我看一下.

本文是根据新闻报道的信息,发表的个人看法.如果有雷同,那也是奇迹了.

另外,我们根本用不了discord,discord不支持代理,而且就算全系统设置代理登陆discord也会被误认为机器人.

麻烦提供telegram等更优秀的沟通渠道!谢谢

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Capture.JPG

Capture 2.JPG

太荒唐了,我都没看过你们的原文,居然说是抄袭!
It's ridiculous. I haven't read your original, but I say it's plagiarism!


如果你是官方的,我可以把我这段中文翻译英文给你,但如果你不是,就不要多事了.
If you are official, I can translate my Chinese into English for you, but if you are not, ignore it!

你确定,你是懂知识产权法的吗?
Are you sure you understand the intellectual property law?


  1. 引述事实和新闻的信息,会有雷同,这是完全正常的,不是侵权要件.你举的这段内容,也并非完全一样.这么小段的对事实的描述,会有雷同,是比较常见的.
  2. 引述的内容占总体文章的比例过低,也不涉及侵权,
  3. 引述事实的描述,而得出不同的主观评论,也不涉及侵权.

根据youtube的示范,你那怕把一个内容(文字/视频)完全打乱重组后,表达不同的主观判断,也不属于侵权!

另外,如果不懂中文,也不懂知识产权,就不要乱评判和downvote,谢谢!
By the way, if you don't know Chinese or intellectual property, don't judge and downvote randomly. Thank you!


  ·  5 years ago (edited)

The paragraph is exactly the same as in your post. Word to word. A person does not need to use translator to see that both are exactly the same. Please do not plagiarize again.

Capture2.JPG

Capture.JPG

Exactly I have even better source

All you did is just plagiarizing the writing from different sources.
You have plagiarized three paragraphs directly from the source that I have just given.

Your post:
Capture.JPG

Source:
Capture2.JPG

It is not teh first time that you have been caught abusing Steemit.
Two2 weeks ago you were caught spamming with comments and farming on them:
https://steemit.com/food/@lvziyun/q55rh3

It is evident that you are on Steemit in order to abuse it.