Right from time I don't really like club status and I also love it because it makes steemians to grow.
If clubstatus never existed, alot of steemians will always feel reluctant to power up their steem thereby making them not to grow faster or at sn average speed.
The clubstatus scheme caused some harm but I must say that it also has it's positive side.
Clubstatus was no longer a compulsory thing in steemit before steemians can get some kind of support and I forgot to remove it from my contests posts and when you mentioned me 6 days ago I had to take correction by editing my contests posts.
Sorry, but many do grow because the rewards shown are only 50% of the total. Also what you say isn't true. The first years many Steemians proved that they did powerup and big part of them is still around. You might be shocked if you check their SP.
Next to that those "lot of Steemians" you refer to might not be such a big lost. Are they the writers of good content or those who drain the platform? In the last case.. if they take everything it will sooner or later affect them simply because they will never have enough so the moment arrive they will power down..
Let's not forget this platform is in the first case meant for investors.
It's good to hear you answer and you simply forgot. That happens and you also acted.
I wish you a great day, with our without club.
Ps. If it comes to clubs... many who pay prizes might look as if they are not in a club although they do not keep 1 Steem for themselves (I am one of them). So what does the club status say or proof?
Perhaps I should stop giving Steem away to keep it?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yes but you can't compare then and now, things are different now, there are also different sets of steemians now, even if some of those ones that started then are still in the platform.
Thanks for the reply.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit