I thank you for sharing your experiences and thoughts about more than one topic since it was about: why hostst of contests demand a clubstatus if they don't have one themselves.
The steemitblog text you cited is not much different from the month before and the one in September. Interesting might be if it will be read since SC leaving comments (which was asked the SC teams for October to do so) wasn't done either.
People did receive support (from old communities they invested in) and some indeed from whales. SBI was a good initiative (to save and invest) and upvoting (using the vote) was promoted as well (without engagement nothing works).
Those first year were people as well who tried hard to make an income and it was possible to find them, as much as it is today or perhaps today it's even harder.
Let's see what 2025 brings. Who knows the year of the dragon will end very positively and the platform will be more social.
Semi-decentralized.. might be good to make users aware of what decentralized means.
A discussion about the usefulness of burningsteem... I believe the comment of @the-gorilla shows that whatever the idea behind it is, doesn't work. We talked about this topic more than once and no one can tell if the steem is really burned. I would love to see how it's transferred and how the burning is done. If this is the case why not burn a part of what is mined?
A great Friday and weekend to you!
Yes, I touched on multiple topics because I read all the comments you received. 😁
It's true, you were talking about the inconsistency of some community curators who ask members to join clubs, but they are the first ones who don't care.
It's bad certainly, but it's also bad to make users think they are mandatory when they are not and in fact it's not written anywhere.
Precisely because I feel the same way as @the-gorilla I think it's time to talk more about it.
A few old users had made interesting proposals, such as buying part of steem through SBDs and then finding a way to burn them by taking them out of circulation.
It has to be a mechanism within the platform to provide for burning, it cannot depend on some users deciding to sacrifice a portion of their rewards.
The problem is not to see if it is burned, every steemit wallet can be controlled by everyone, the real problem is to be sure that no one has the keys to the null wallet and that it cannot be hacked.
It's not impossible, by now burning is used by so many platforms, TronDao itself has been practicing burning for a long time, communicating it daily to its followers on X. In short, I believe that a solution other than the current one can be found. 😜
Happy weekend to you too.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Every wallet can be controlled but the wallet @null is empty.
Not one single Steem ever arrived in it. So I do believe it is important to show/explain where the Steem is transferred to. The auto reply received is from an account/Steemian who earned before the hardfork well and changed the name and owns @null or?
If mining can't be stopped the value can go up or we are satisfied with the balue as it is.
Thanks for the burning info.
🍀♥️
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit