From the moment the development of AI came to be, there has always been in the air and in writing about AI this, AI that and it's as if AI own the place.
I attented a seminar sometimes last month and the speaker was encouraging his audience (including me) about the importance of making use of AI and yet he needed help navigating the use of AI in making research, Lol...even those who knows little or nothing about AI brag about it and make a show of it.
I am not against the use of AI, but the trick here is that the more we use AI , the more we depend on them and then we can merely do anything if Mr AI is not around to help out or there is a problem with the app or operating system. The best option is to combine both effort, the AI can come up with the piece, while the human factor edits what the AI has done or it can be the other way around.
The more we leave the AI do all the work and take the credit, the mind becomes idle, and a simple task or even a simple thinking pattern elides us and we miss out on a lot of things. I did a write up one time about a similar thought, and there were those that had the same thought and those that were against. But I think this is best, and this is my submission.
Thank you for your time....
You can also participate in this daily prompt by clicking here
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit