Collusion Attack and Its Effect on the Blockchain Network

INTRODUCTION

Source

A collusion attack may be defined as the activities conducted by participants of a blockchain to subvert or gain undue control over network operations in an attempt to profit the members of the group. In a distributed environment, where each participant is assumed to be operating autonomously, collusion attacks pose a threat to the fairness and reliability of the system. Such attacks largely focus on achieving dominance over a consensus protocol, facilitating illegal payments, or eroding the functional character of the network.

Collusion attacks are specifically dangerous for blockchains based on consensus algorithms such as Proof of Stake (POS) and Delegated Proof of Stake (DPOS). Here, the allied powerful entities can compromise the consensus by voting participants where large power lies enabling dominant excess thanks to temp or compulsion by other parties. This shift in power structure drains the decentralized strength of the cyberledger system leading to risk for the system users and the system itself.

The impacts of collusion attacks are quite destructive cutting across from hampering network trust to encouraging deviant behaviors. Such attacks could strategically affect the trust and reliability of a blockchain and make users refrain from using it. It is therefore important to study collusion attacks with their relevant factors in order to provide an appropriate defense to blockchain systems.

UNDERMINING DECENTRALIZATION:

Decentralization is one aspect of blockchain technology which does not allow one person or group to be able to monopolize the system. Another principle is the threat in form of ‘collusion attacks’. This is when a specified number of participants work against the interest of the rest and persuade them to endorse their agenda. Moreover, governance has recently some of the centralized aspects. For instance, in the cases of single owners, ruling elites or a small number of consensus nodes, this body can deceptively endorse the validation of a deceitful transaction or even start censoring any civil transaction.

There is always, however, a tendency for hastap, decision making powers to be concentrated in the upper echelons of the system. This can entice narrow-minded decision making flows where masses are sacrificed in favor of the culprits. In addition to reaching above the baseline of decentralization, there is also a feeling of security that it provides against attacks by malicious enterprising people who actually may infiltrate or pay off other peo-associates.

Such forms of attacks go against the expectation of users and participants concerning respect for fairness of the blockchain. People will be unmotivated to partake in such projects since it is only a few individual’s who will champions the calls made by the networks making it less harmful.

MANIPULATING CONSENSUS MECHANISMS:

Source

Collusion attacks are among the most grave threats for consensus models that make use of Proof of Stake (PoS) and Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS). The influence of a participant is proportional to the amount of cryptocurrency that he/she has or the number of votes he/she gets. Because we can only speculate about the motive behind this collusion, they are able to distort the voting process in such a way that allows them to approve given transactions which would have otherwise been denied.

In PoS networks, participants in collusion can concentrate their attacks in order to obtain against a majority of the staking power, leading them to be able to validate blocks whenever they want regardless of what the network stands for. Likewise, in a DPoS system, colluding delegates are able to use their collective votes to remain at the helm of the network by the delinquent delegates almost completely repressing growing factions that may threaten the status quo.

The informed manipulation of consensus mechanisms not just bruises the core of the network but also discourages any honest individuals from participating in the system. There is a high likelihood that members who have such a sense of the system may opt out, thus making the system weak and unstable.

FACILITATING DOUBLE-SPENDING ATTACKS

One of the possible effects of such types of attack is the operational efficiency of double-spending attacks. During a double-spending attack, a malicious user tries to bypass the restriction of being unable to ensure the unique spending of a given cryptocurrency token. Normally, this is mitigated by the consensus mechanism of the database in a blockchain where only permitted and double-checked transactions are recorded. In a collusion attack, however, colluding members of the attack can agree and validate a double-spending transaction even when it’s not permitted.

For instance, a case could be observed in a PoS network whereby colluding participants were able to approve duplicate usage of tokens in one transaction on two transactions. This shifts the advantage of using the blockchain, as users would use it under the certainty that their transactions are not compromised. Such attacks have a significant effect, as they can cause losses to users and erode the trust in the network to counteract fraudulent activity.

The threat of double-spending attacks is heightened when the colluding parties possess most of the staking power and thus control a large portion of the network. This enables them to indulge in backer ‘voting’ and risk approval of good transactions that will introduce friction in operations in the network.

REDUCING NETWORK SECURITY AND TRUST

An effective collusion attack threatens the safety and credibility of the entire blockchain network. Instead of normal procedures being used, these participants can undermine the fairness of the consensus process and validate false information and ignore valid ones. This leads to depreciated confidence in the blockchain since it no longer is possible for users to believe that the network is fair and secure.

Apart from this, loss of this trust can cause problems within the network as such circulation will lead to lowered participation as well as lowering of investments. Most users will exit the network or reduce the degree to which they are active reducing the security and optimizing potential of the blockchain. Also because of the few actors who hold excessive power within the network, the several weaknesses within the network can be easily exploited from the outside as those causing malfunction are easy to pay off or corrupt.

To keep the blockchain network in check so that collusion cannot be carried out, there is a need to put in place effective mechanisms such as distribution of power and availing accountability in the decision-making processes. By tackling the areas that facilitate collusion in the blockchain networks, the network can remain healthy and strong in terms of responding to disputes or confrontation.

CONCLUSION

Source

The integrity of the distributed nature of Blockchain networks is at serious risk due to collusion attacks. These attacks allow certain participants to collude and compromise the consensus process which robs the network of trust, security and fairness.

Such collusion attacks have some very adverse consequences including less decentralization, voting mechanisms that can be abused, double-spending attacks, and less security of the network, and posing a number of challenges. Therefore, coming to grips with such risks and taking preventive actions is very important for the advance of this technology.