Legend: A rather overlooked fantasy Tom Cruise film

in hive-166960 •  3 years ago 

I've been on an 80's kick lately as far as films are concerned and in my "travels down memory lane" I have rewatched a bunch of films that I originally saw when I was a kid. A lot of the time, I regret going back and revisiting the films because time has not been very kind to them. As epic as an adventure that Legend was, audiences simply didn't take to the film and it ended up losing money. They probably got that money back later with VHS and later DVD sales, but when it was released in 1985, people simply didn't like it.


image.png
src

For me, the failure of this film didn't make much sense because we had a relatively huge budget for the time-period, we had an up and coming heart throb of an actor in Tom Cruise and we also had some of the most amazing costume work that films had ever seen and an amazing actor in Tim Curry playing the role of The Lord of Darkness.


image.png
src

The story itself is rather childlike in that the Lord of Darkness wants to put the earth into a state of eternal darkness and he can do so by capturing mystical unicorns that can only be discovered by someone who is pure of heart which obviously is not the Lord or his minions. They instead make a trap as Princess Lili is able to summon them and of course the unicorns are immediately captured.


image.png
src

Sound goofy enough yet? Well it gets weirder.

The minions who killed one of the unicorns and captured the other are of course, easily followed by the hapless Princess Lili as she follows them back to the Lord of Darkness' lair and it is there that she is of course also captured and now Jack (Tom Cruise) has to get the help of some magical buddies to rescue her as well as save the world from eternal darkness.

I will admit it isn't much of a story and we all know how this is going to turn out without even watching the film. The story isn't what makes this film pretty damn great in my mind. The costumes, the lighting, the music, and the makeup were just outstanding given the time period. Also, the complete lack of CGI at the time meant that virtually everything we see on screen had to be meticulously created by Ridley Scott and his team.


image.png
src

Later on the innocent Princess Lili ends up in an evil outfit of sorts and became the goth fantasy of every boy that saw the film.

I'm not going to say that the acting was particularly good in this movie because it didn't need to be. Some of the characters are downright annoying especially Honeythorn Gump who is an always shirtless elf boy who is full of wisdom.


image.png
src

I very rarely appreciate child actors in leading roles and this was something I felt even when I was still a child.

Critics recognized what I now realize in that the dialogue and acting wasn't particularly good for anyone involved because as Roger Ebert said "the effects were so good that the roles could have been played by almost anyone." I can identify with this because it is true. Tim Curry is an exceptional actor but I didn't even realize that it was him playing the Lord of Darkness until I was an adult.


It was very rare in the 80's for films to not have a deep-voiced narrator

Should I watch it?

If you are a fan of fantasy films and also enjoy seeing things that not just everyone has already seen, Legend might be a good choice for you. This is a very dark film considering the PG rating and I am pretty surprised they were able to pull that off in such puritan times. I know that the imagery of the Dark Lord was able to invade my nightmares a time or two and I am sure I was not the only kid this happened to.

While the story is pretty weak and of course exceptionally predictable, the effects and makeup is extremely well done especially considering the time-period. I've seen this multiple time and still gladly would watch it again. It is, IMO, a piece of cinematic history. Despite very poor box office performance the film was nominated for multiple awards including BAFTA's and Oscars.


50119633_m.jpg

What did you think of Legend?

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Never saw it, might give it a try someday...

With regards to the box office: talk about unfortunate timing: Release was in 1985, but in the US actually only on April 18th 1986, while Topgun released in May 1986.

If this movie had been released a month AFTER Topgun in the US, you might have had some benefit from starring the same actor (though probably in a totally different role)

ah thanks for educating me on the release date. One would assume that the audiences would have attended both. I guess fantasy just wasn't most people's thing back then.

In 80's or 90's people didn't like these kinds of dream stories, after the hit of the Narnia series of films people wanted to watch them again and that why Netflix or amazon primes release again and again

I don't even remember when Narnia was released. I think LOTR probably got people interested in the fantasy genre. They are very difficult and expensive to make, that is for sure. I tried to like the Narnia films but in the end I simply didn't like them. Too much CGI for my liking.

I watched after your writing. I very liked, especially The Demond. Jim Curty played in role the Demond. He did very nice performance.

Two places in the movie caught my attention. First, the devil says to the princess are you hungry, but the girl says no. in the devil: he smiles after saying 'lie'. So even though he is the devil, he likes to lie, but the girl is lying onq. On the one hand, he does not want the lie to be used against him, on the other hand, he likes it because it is lied to and smiles.

Secondly,; The fairy is flying fast to mirror the sun in the final scene, its shape resembles a spaceship when viewed carefully and paused during this flight. Already director Ridley Scott is shooting the movie The Alien, which later became a serial, and takes place in the space shuttle.