That certainly "sounds good".
However, it does absolutely nothing to fix the REAL PROBLEM.
They're still targeting specific accounts (airdrop some accounts and not other accounts).
And by neglecting to even acknowledge the REAL PROBLEM (de facto centralization by anyone with sufficient stake or by anyone powerful enough or charismatic enough to collude with major exchanges), they seem doomed to FASCISM.
Which is fine. We casually accept dictatorial control from our governments and our corporate jobs and our parents. Why would anyone expect the steem blockchain to be any different.
I just wish they'd stop droning on and on about "decentralization" and "protecting personal property" and "libertarian principles".
What a flipping joke!
Decentralization and dPoS do seem
to conflict with one another. I can
see why you're frustrated by this.
People believe both can exist, but
eventually they can clash. JS doing
with his dPoS breaks decentralization.
Freezing assets breaks dPoS. Maybe
one day someone can build a chain
that works like it says it should.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit