many are out of context for a post in the Newcomers' Community, so perhaps I'll try to put them into a separate post in a different context
As I wrote this, I considered the same. But "Rules" were requested. So as much as it pained me, I wrote some Rules.
In addition to the uses that you mentioned, I think it's also ok to quote AI output in an article, as long as it's limited, relevant, and acknowledged
Agreed. As we've discussed before, it's all about transparency. I'll need to update the article to include this.
In addition to the uses that you mentioned, I think it's also ok to quote AI output in an article, as long as it's limited, relevant, and acknowledged
Good point, I'll include this too. The moderator needs to be intelligent and exclude Diary Games from this (probably).
key update today from the US Copyright Office for protection of AI-generated works:
And this copyright has been discussed elsewhere online - most AI is infringing on the original author's copyright by sharing their content / intellectual property without permission.
I wouldn't be surprised if we see a class-action lawsuit from website owners against AI's unauthorised use of their content.
I agree. It's similar to when Google was sued by publishers and the RIAA. I expect they'll get sued and eventually reach some settlement that involves revenue sharing/royalties.
The new guidelines are about granting new copyrights for artists and writers who use AI, though. It's the output, not the input. Basically, I think Steem's curation decision-makers should follow similar rules to the Copyright office.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This position is hopefully where the article ended up - albeit without knowledge of the Copyright office.
The biggest challenge I’ve found is that whilst I know where my lines of acceptability are, others want a measurable metric. Something which removes subjectivity entirely. Which I keep saying is impossible. But I’ve tried. Always trying. Rarely succeeding.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Agreed. That's why I posted it. I think it reinforces most of what you wrote.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
👍
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit