Science and its incompatible data on the origin of the human species

in hive-175254 •  4 years ago 


Greetings dear friends of the #STEEM platform, in this post I will focus on trying to socialize some descriptive aspects linked to the contradictions that throughout history have arisen about the origin of the human species and more specifically if we contrast the results socialized recently on fossil apes and human evolution.

Let us remember that long before the publication of Charles Darwin's The Origin of Species there were already contradictions on this controversial subject, however, after Darwin's findings, the subsequent discovery of new fossils and the beginning of new research began to provide evidence of the evolution of the human species from other species, until consolidating a scientific area that would later receive the name of Paleoanthropology.

Fig. 2 It is currently considered a mistake to think that we are descended from monkeys. Image of public domain, Author: Suju-foto, 2018

The breaking point is that the hypothesis on the origin of the human species is not compatible with the fossil record, hence, fossil apes are often at the center of the debate, as some scientists discard their importance in the origins of the human lineage (hominids), while another group of experts confer them a stellar role in evolution.

These imprecise positions cause science to offer incompatible data on the origin of the human species, therefore, it is understandable that among experts in Paleoanthropology there are groups that are working under completely different paradigms, which is not very unlikely to occur in other fields of science.

Fig. 3 The fossil data represent enormous contradictions within paleoanthropology. Image of public domain, Author: Pixabay

The contradictions are of such magnitude that, in the current context, some scientific disciplines support paleoanthropology in order to promote a true reinvention of the study of the origin and evolution of the human species..

However, the truth is that, in a study entitled "Fossil apes and human evolution", researchers found that most of the stories about human origins are not compatible with the fossils we have today, and where it is inferred that living apes alone do not provide sufficient evidence to reconstruct the starting point of the human species.


BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES CONSULTED:


[1] Almécija S., Hammond A., Thompson< N., Pugh K., and Moyà S Fossil apes and human evolution. Science. 2021; 372: 6542: eabb4363. Article: Online access

[2] Reuters Fossil Evidence on Human Origins and Dispersal. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. 1986; 51; 1: 419 – 28. Article: Online access


OBSERVATION


The cover image was designed by the author: @lupafilotaxia, incorporating the public domain image background: HistoriansWiki, 2020


Original manuscript, uploaded from the Project HOPE community website


Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

hello @lupafilotaxia
it is a very controversial subject, on the one hand some people believe that humans developed from apes and others more daring say that we are part of a genetic experiment of ancient visitors to the earth as for example the stories of the anunnakis, all this makes me think that these stories are not crazy and that there is a probability that life and the development of human beings does not have its origin on earth.

@tipu curate 2