Let's Write Some Theology

in hive-179764 •  4 years ago 

The person who found the plane was not a subject, but a society with a subject. Collectively operational propulsion capability was the reason to find the aircraft. Moreover, the task of finding the aircraft would have to have "in addition to the" external drive ", there must also be a" collective power and collective capacity as a secondary drive medium for internal reason ".

image.png
src

The environment had a drive effect on the person's body, converting light energy into warming energy. But people lacked the drive of an applied collective force that would transform light energy into heat energy. Initial floods the ancestors lacked a collective complementarity.

There were video drives in the vicinity. Persons are enthusiasts with this arousal. With this enthusiasm, people first flew over an imaginary Phoenix theology. Later, enthusiasm turned into flying carpets, flying on carpets,

Although flying had an uncertain drive (theological) force in the external environment, external "driving force" such as transforming flight into an airplane and transforming light into heat with resistance was only possible with "collective operating propulsion". Collective operations were in nature, but collective operations were outside of person. The collective operations were independent of the person, out of the will and consciousness of the person.

Just like every physiology that could not make wings because of the theological and metaphysical pressure of the environment in the primitive world, images with every uncertainty and operating forces would not be able to reveal the theology and metaphysics that would make flying.

The sacrifice offering would turn into an act of sacrifice, of "saving one's own life, quenching the anger of an external world that is angry with its obstacles" over "the energy stored by the accumulation of collectively driven production".

There was no collective accumulation in the first flood period. If there was no collective accumulation, there was no sacrificial period continuum to be presented within the collective accumulation. In other words, the enthusiasm of theology during the first flood to make a sacrificial offering would not have raised wings and offered many sacrifices in the first flood period.

Yesterday's theology was a self-centered and self-centered theology, starting in the person himself, considering nature alive instead of being a flood.

Today's theology, on the other hand, was a match of shadow from the outer center of the imag, whose privatization was greedy over collective operations, reflected from a consciousness of will. He explained the special purpose of matching. The theological meaning would not stay "in memories as facts lie in the bottle."

The theological understanding would evolve considerably within the meanings linked to collective possessive and personal possessive intellectual spirit. The theological understanding would not stop there. With the idea of ​​creating and designing with the theological discourse of owning the property by making the field wide by hand; would shadow even the idea of ​​owning the property

Creator theology, with its more comprehensive meaning, with the meaning that transformed into the consciousness of being the creator of the universe, and its caliphate that it gave to property owners, would now turn into logic that "gives man the power of succession" in this confusion.

Whereas if there was a caliphate, then yes humans were the successors of the deities. But the caliphate was not a man but a collective force capable of driving a collective function. Was it not the associated collective force that produced the divinity of the deities as well?

Theology continued on its way by taking on meanings according to the relationship between the processes that started to form and produced according to the primary process. Current theology has also flourished on the notion of becoming the caliph who owns bare, pure property.

Thus, the meaning of theology, which has been continuing with the changes in understanding and expression since the first flood, totem period, divine period, was covered with a new understanding. The exploitation, the person of which was hidden in greed, was also hidden in theology. The exploitation concealed within theology had literally entered the pot of matryoshka.

Light was information-carrying modulation with a loaded "magnetic field". The theological state with various stimulation and sensations reflected in the concrete; for example, transformed into imaginary mind patterns with the form of energy that transformed from light to information. It was the upper-brain thinking that we infer, with utilitarianism derived from images, who initiated outward orientations from himself.

Every concrete life had an image, a shadow for the person, and a subjective understanding that remained in our minds. In this first flood process, in which causality could not be associated with facts and events, shadow reflected meaning understanding was very important.

He had a virtual sense of meaning that matched every image that had a cause to him rather than a cause. Darkness was not taken to rest. The absence of light therefore, the perception of threats to be invisible also matched the darkness as fear.

Yet the threat did not exist because of the darkness. And the threat did not exist in the mere darkness. It was, at most, an instrument in which the dark threat was concealed. And it was equipped with an accessory look to the threat from the dark outside.

Hand; it rested on the expansions of concrete, producing collective power. Current theology acted as possessive will and governing power. The hand would act with the uncertainties of the proprietor's willpower.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!