RE: 【Middle East Eye】Ilan Pappe warns that Israel's plans for Gaza risk prolonging Palestinian suffering through potential expulsions and annexation, urging international intervention to prevent further atrocities

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

【Middle East Eye】Ilan Pappe warns that Israel's plans for Gaza risk prolonging Palestinian suffering through potential expulsions and annexation, urging international intervention to prevent further atrocities

in hive-180106 •  2 months ago 

Yes, you're right. Back when the British were in charge, Arab leaders usually called themselves Arabs instead of Palestinians, showing the strong pan-Arab nationalist vibe of that era. Resistance, including calls for jihad, was more about Arab unity than a unique Palestinian identity. The concept of being distinctly Palestinian really started to take shape in the mid-1900s, especially after Israel was founded in 1948 and everything that came with it.

Before 1967, Egypt was in charge of Gaza, and Jordan controlled the West Bank. Back then, there wasn’t much talk about creating a separate Palestinian state. This was mostly because of the political situation and the focus on larger Arab nationalist movements. The push for a Palestinian state really picked up after the 1967 Six-Day War, as Palestinians began to seek self-determination while dealing with being stateless.

And yes, that's true. Jews and Arabs both have strong historical and cultural connections to the area. Jewish ties go way back to ancient kingdoms of Solomon and David, while Arabs have lived there for centuries. Things really heated up during the British Mandate, with both sides clashing as they fought for control of the land.

Maybe the two-state solution is a way to handle the conflict? Imagine a future where both Israel and an independent Palestine exist side by side, recognizing each other and living in peace.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

This is true.

Palestinians had many chances for 2 state solutions but rejected them all.
For example, in 2005, Israel unilaterally removed all their soldiers from Gaza to show that they would be very willing for a two-state solution and peace. They forcefully removed thousands of Jews from the North of Gaza, including the removal of the Jewish cemetery and moving it to Israel. They left behind all Jewish infrastructure, kibbutzes, farms and greenhouses. These were businesses producing products for international export. The first thing that Gazans did was burn all of this to the ground instead of taking over to continue the business and live there. Then in 2006, they elected Hamas. They could have created a second Singapore there but they chose a life of war, hate and destruction.

The most generous offer for a two-state solution was offered by Clinton to Arafat but he rejected it.

Bill Clinton recently explained what really happened then.

"Bill Clinton addresses Israel–Hamas war at Kamala Harris rally in Michigan"