Giudicare / Judge (IT/EN) - Bot Judge on Twitter

in hive-184714 •  5 months ago  (edited)

Non sapevo cosa cercare con la parola "giudice", tutti i risultati erano gli stessi, indipendentemente dal fatto che aggiungessi una parola o meno. Anche "giudicare un giudice" mostrava lo stesso risultato. Per un'idea ho cercato su Internet e l'unica cosa che ho visto era "giudice su X". Giudice su X mostrava solo lo stesso giudice, quindi invece di "X" ho usato Twitter e ho aggiunto il bot perché non ho l'illusione che un essere umano sia il giudice di una piattaforma di social media. Sono bot, bot e bot e persino il servizio clienti è un bot che non è in grado di capire cosa intendi se lo contatti.
La vita sarebbe migliore se il giudice fosse un bot? Potrebbe esserlo se è programmato bene e usa una politica equa, ma se si arriva a questo punto molto probabilmente non sarà così.


_061028f7-61c3-4014-b629-cf78eb9a5777.jpg

EN



I didn't know what to search for with the word "judge' all the results were the same no matter if I added a word or not. Also "judging a judge" showed the same result. For an idea I searched on the internet and the only thing I saw was "judge on X". Judge on X only showed the same judge so instead of "X" I used Twitter and added the bot because I don't have the illusion a human being is the judge of any social media platform. It's bots, bots and bots and even the customer service is a bot not able to understand what you mean if you contact them.
Would life be better if the judge is a bot? Can be if it's programmed well and uses a fair policy but if it comes to it most likely that will not be the case.


PhotoGrid_1613071815865.png


Header/Photogrid: Canva
Picture: AI-generated by me - bing.com/create
Search: Bot Judge on Twitter (bing.com doesn't know what X is)
Translation: google free
8-10-2024

#italygame #ai-test #freewrite #judge #club100

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Preferisco che il giudice sia umano, anche se abbiamo tanti difetti, quando un giudice emette la sua sentenza è stato aiutato da altre persone, NON è lui solo a decidere.
Ora se il giudice è un robot, è proprio il robot, con innumerevoli conoscenze incorporate dall'uomo, NON ci sono punti da osservare, solo le conoscenze niente di più, il robot non ha quella sensazione che lo fa analizzare .

At least a robot judge can't be bought...

Exactly. It's only to be aware the robot to not be approached by humans before a trial, to avoid reprogramming😂

The criminal will find away around anything. If only I had such determination in my endeavors.

In such a case, better things as they are. In any way, a human judge can't be reprogrammed...or even better: a non-reprogrammable robot

or using some remote control.. or they blow the system. What will happen if there's a blackout?

That is what we believe but is it true? What if they need some oil, new parts or change into something with wished and dreams like human?

  ·  4 months ago (edited)

There are no ultimate material solutions. Everything has some flaw built into it. For one thing everything material is temporary. Like these bodies. But not just these bodies... EVERYTHING in this material world is temporary. And other flaws along the way. It is a helpless situation but we keep trying to hold everything together.
image.png

If you ask me the main problem with human species is that they try very hard to ignore the fact that who lives dies and there's no "endless" if it comes to us. What we create might exist longer but there is validation date on everything even if we live too short to notice it.
It's the same with the earth. What we experience today is not different from what generations before us had to deal with. The world had an Ice Age and also a period of a high temp and back then it wasn't due to a high population, plastic, industry or whatever. I guess we all need a reset Mother Earth included.

Google Gemini doesn't allow humans so this is the result of "taking water to the sea"

aquas in mare fundere

Gemini_Generated_Image_7k6rip7k6rip7k6r.jpg

Gemini_Generated_Image_xeaqofxeaqofxeaq.jpg

die den riken gevet sijn goet, hi ghietet water in de vloet (who gives the rich his property, takes water to the sea).

Turns out the idiom its meaning changed through the years. Today it's mainly about a pointless act while it was before about filling the wallets of the rich seen as a useless act. Isn't that interesting? Did the rich have a hand in this?

Interesting how the perspective changes like that. It's really very clear...

TEAM 7

Congratulations!

THE QUEST TEAM has supported your post. We support quality posts, good comments anywhere, and any tags


postbanner.JPG

Curated by : @sduttaskitchen

Fortissimo!😂😂😂😂Ma io mi fiderei di più di un robot che di umani😂😂😂😂

I start thinking that but if it comes to it that robot is programmed or it will program itself. I also learned that robots aren't the smartest around so it might get annoying. Annoying for me.
Ever watched the film/series: Real Human?

robots look like humans, become the lovers, fight for equal rights and in the end they find the humans as well...

Never heard about, but I watched several times The bicentennial man: inspired to Asimov, my favourite sci-fi writer😂😂😂😂. Obviously, not to take as serious😂😂😂😂...or to interpret as my mother did😂😂😂😂