The problem that bothers me is how to correctly identify AI content. I currently work as a moderator in a community and I check the content of its users every day. There I have to check articles in languages other than English and in some cases the tools show that the content contains AI. One tool shows that it does not contain AI and another tool shows that the content contains AI. Since the language is not English, I cannot read them and check if it is actually written by a human. I wonder what to do in such cases. All I can do is translate it.
But we cannot rely on tools alone. Therefore, we must definitely read the content and check it carefully to see if it has the characteristics of AI content. But how do we check such characteristics in content written in an unknown language? What steps should we take when dealing with languages that we do not understand?
Even if the AI detector shows that the content contains AI, it could actually be written by the user themselves. In such a case, how would the user feel if we told him or her that the content contains AI? No matter how the tools show information, what happens if I, as a moderator, rely on that information and accuse an innocent user...?
Something like that happened to me today. I'm really sorry about it. I had to accuse someone who didn't do anything wrong. That was when I went to check content in a language I didn't know. I still feel sorry for accusing someone innocent.
At that time, the two admins of our community read the content carefully and clearly informed me that it was not AI content, so I was able to correct my mistake. But I am worried that something like this will happen again in the future.
Greetings friend @nishadi89
Normally, when we have a doubt, we must seek support from others to address the situation in the best possible way, before showing a decision.
In these cases, where the tools do not show us the same tendency, it is very important to ensure our own criteria, for example, content that speaks in a technical and general way about a point or topic, can be considered in a certain way as AI.
We must keep in mind that users found a way for a tool not to detect the cheating, so, not all of them are reliable. There are texts that reveal themselves.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yes, it's definitely better to get help from others in such a situation. If we rely solely on what the tools show, even non-AI content can be mistaken for AI.
I agree with you on this point. Also, events related to someone's life, such as a diary game, may not be AI content even if from tools show the presence of AI.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit