Ok, thank you for clarifying. I read the post but like I said, struggled to understand your English.
Again, using ngoenyi as the example, she is the admin or moderator of 5 communities - 3 of which are amongst the largest and most visited on the platform.
Presumably, she was selected for her involvement in 1 community in particular - steem4nigeria. As I mentioned before, the country that she's also a country representative for.
Whereas you have highlighted her activity as "highly suspicious" which will presumably tarnish her reputation - a little thought and the knowledge that I have stated with you above should make you realise that you highlighting people in this way is rash, uninformed and unfair.
As an anecdote of myself, I curated sports content. I am also the admin of the primary sports community on Steemit. I say primary, perhaps only would be a better choice of word. Were I still a curator, I'd be in your "highly suspicious" category because OBVIOUSLY, I'd be selecting posts within my sports community as my favourite. Is this dishonest? Is it "suspicious"?
Or the fact of the matter....
⚠️ There is a diverse selection of curators from a diverse selection of communities because this method of selecting posts is expected from them ⚠️
I really hope that those who have already visited your post, along with the Steemit team take this information for what it is rather than the implied wrongdoing that this post presents.
Thank you for sharing your opinion with us, I think you are not understanding. The curator is free to select whoever they want, in any community or tag, what stands out is the people who are involved in the moderation of the same community.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You are correct. I've stated twice already that I have struggled to understand your English so "think" is inappropriate because I am "clearly" not understanding.
Are you aware that people who become moderators of big communities are invited to do so because they're extremely good content creators themselves? Or as admins of a big community, their communities are big because of their ability to create content and attract users?
Therefore, why does it come as a surprise when people who are put in this position for being good content creators receive votes from good content curators?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit