Big news happening today in California... they're facing several fires.
CONVERSATION: What are the implications of posting content from other sources/businesses if you choose to use 100% null beneficiary? How will it be recieved?
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
I used to set 99¢ max payout for this kind of stuff. I think setting beneficiaries to null is much better because curators are more incentivized. Maybe even 80% to null is acceptable, or whatever for a "finder's fee."
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I wonder if we can even somehow facilitate communities that can play by generally accepted tactics like this that can better compete with how Reddit operates. Because if communities can only be original content then we're gonna be at a huge advantage for lots of types of communities. But if there are communities making economic gain from other people's stuff then that's a huge issue.
Null and smart beneficiaries has to be a part of it i'm guessing.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit