Recent animal sex studies work to dispel two common myths: that sex is only about reproduction and that homosexuality is an unnatural sexual preference. It is now clear that sex is just about fun as it often is during sex. And imitation of the same sex and binding is common to many species, from bonobo monkeys to houses.
In addition, same-sex couples in the Animal Kingdom tend to be morally upright - and wrong - to refer only to homosexuals. The New York Times reported in an article dated February 7, 2004, about a few gay men who desperately wanted to keep their eggs together.
In the same article ("Love Will Never Show Its Name"), Bruce Bagemihl, author of the groundbreaking "Biological Exuberance: Animal Homosexuality and Natural Diversity", describes homosexuality as "any of these behaviors between members of the same sex: long-term bond, communication. Sexual. , to date or to raise a family. ”
However, the fact that certain behaviors occur in nature ("naturally") does not give that behavior. Infanticide, patricide, suicide, sexual bias, and drug abuse - all found in a variety of animals. It is useless to argue or disprove homosexuality based on animalistic ideas. Moral values are about transcending nature - not imitating him.
The most perplexing question remains: what are the evolutionary and natural benefits of sexual pleasure and homosexuality? Indeed, both involve the destruction of scarce resources.
Confirmed explanations, such as those presented by Marlene Zuk (homosexuals who give birth to a genetic predisposition to raising and nurturing younger siblings) undermine understanding, knowledge, and evolutionary statistics. There are no field lessons that fully demonstrate or suggest that homosexuals tend to raise and care for younger relatives.
In addition, genetic engineering may undermine that strategy. If the purpose of life was to transfer human genes from one generation to the next, a gay man would be better off raising his children (who share part of his DNA) - rather than his niece or nephew (his partner is only one-quarter of his genes.)
Furthermore, even though genetics are involved, homosexuality can be partially calculated, it is the result of nature and care, not nature.
The often overlooked fact is that the sex of pleasure and homosexuality has one thing in common: it does not lead to productivity. Homosexuality, therefore, can be a form of sexual pleasure. It can also encourage homosexuality and train young people to form cohesive, purposeful groups (the school host family comes to mind).
Moreover, homosexuality equates to the removal of 10-15% of genes in each generation. The essence of homosexual genes is no longer distributed and successfully released in the major roulette of life. Farmers - anything from grain to cattle - similarly use random packing to improve their livestock. As statistical models show, such repeated removal of DNA from common beverages appears to amplify species and increase their resilience and efficiency.
It is strange to see that homosexuality and other forms of entertainment, the pursuit of pleasure, can be major forms of evolution and the driving force behind human power. Reproduction is just one of many equally important goals. Homosexuality is just one strategy among a few good solutions. Studying biology can also lead to greater tolerance for the greater repetition of human personality flaws, preferences, and speculations. Back in nature, in this case, it may have evolved into a civilization.