Whether out of fear of failure or complete lack of original ideas, big movie and TV studios have turned to reboots, remakes and sequels to decades-old hits, anything to keep the dollars flowing. Trouble is, they’re all terrible.
Just this year, Disney has released “live-action” remakes of its 1990s animated classics Aladdin and Lion King, following up on 2016’s Jungle Book. These are almost frame-for-frame remakes of the original animations, rendered with live actors and computer technology. Next up? Lady and the Tramp with actual dogs. Not kidding. There’s even a term for it: “reboot culture.”
Who needs them? The obvious answer is that Disney does, for $2.5 billion combined reasons – the worldwide gross take of Lion King and Aladdin remakes. It’s a sad truth that this strip-mining of nostalgia using digital effects is profitable.
© Disney via ZUMAPRESS.com
Except when it isn’t, as exemplified by Disney’s attempt at Star Wars sequels – the second of which alienated so many fans that the filmmakers blamed ‘Russian bots’ for the outpouring of frustration online. To which I would say only, “These are not the droids you are looking for, move along.”
Social networks were roiling again on Tuesday, when it was announced that Spider-Man may get rebooted yet again, after Sony and Disney failed to reach a deal on integrating the character into the Marvel cinematic universe. This despite the fact that Tom Holland’s portrayal was the third version of the friendly neighborhood superhero since 2002, and by far the most popular.
Raise your hand if you want to see Uncle Ben die again? Yeah, thought so. Me neither.
Cast your eyes on the top 10 US movies of 2019, and it’s a sea of sequels, reboots, franchises and spinoffs. Upcoming releases are the same way. Are 1980s action stars so desperate that they need to come out of retirement? At least Rambo: Last Blood sounds like it could go back to the character’s roots and skip the frankly sad second and third installments, weaponized as Cold War propaganda. A “woke” reboot that is Terminator: Dark Fate just looks embarrassing.
Speaking of 1980s action flicks, mere rumors that Die Hard could be rebooted have caused an outpouring of outrage, with fans making it perfectly clear that messing with the 1988 version of John McClane and Hans Gruber will not be tolerated.
This is not even going into the trouble with “woke” reboots, such as the 2016 all-female Ghostbusters, or last year’s Ocean’s 8, which were at best treated politely by critics but turned out to be box office bombs. Politics adds a whole other dimension to movies and TV, beyond profit – as seen by ABC’s rush to cancel the revival of Roseanne despite its ratings success, due to the star’s political leanings.
Whether or not you believe there are only “seven basic stories” in the world and everything ever written, filmed or drawn is a variation thereof, there is no escaping the stale stench of warmed-over dead horse that is emanating from Hollywood today.
The latest case in point is the as-yet-untitled fourth installment of The Matrix, also announced this week by Warner Brothers. Perhaps the executives are hoping that the cult status of the 1999 original will make people forget how utterly terrible the sequels turned out.
The Wachowski siblings, who wrote the original trilogy, at least aren’t afraid of trying new things. They later made a smash-hit with a movie adaptation of V for Vendetta (2005), before the epic car wreck that was Speed Racer (2008). While their Jupiter Ascending (2015) was mocked, it was at least watchable and made money – unlike Cloud Atlas (2012), whose author is reportedly one of the screenwriters for the new Matrix installment. Make of that what you will.
In all fairness, there are examples of reboots that actually improve on the original – most notably the 2003 Battlestar Galactica, a grittier and more captivating take on space adventure than the 1978 original. Yet BSG is more of an exception that proves the rule: just because one can remake something because the technology allows it, does not mean it should be done.
We keep hearing about how “diversity” is supposed to be a strength. Let’s get some diversity of ideas, then. It might help Hollywood tell some new stories, for a change.
By Nebojsa Malic
Very true in most cases. I am working right now reboot right now and before we even started filming they already start selling the new toys for the original films 35th anniversary!
Strange thing is this one will likely be better than the original.
Thanks for being a part of Steem rt. Maybe we can change movie cult/cultures for good on here!
Posted using Partiko Android
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
agreed movies have become just pieces of money makers vs Art. the value of art in the hollywood version of the film industry is all gone.
agreed one has to make $ and it makes sense, but people have to start focus on real talent again.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think in many of these cases, they know from the beginning that they can't do better than the original. That might make the difference between more good remakes and bad remakes. There are a few where they want to remake them to bring them more into the future with better special effects, and perhaps better acting, and a bigger budget...and then are ones where the old one, even if it's a bit old, is actually still really good, and they'll anger a lot of fans of the old one.
Redoing an old show as a cash grab doesn't work. Or at least it doesn't work the majority of the time.
Redoing an old show to try to do it better only works some of the time. There is still a good chance that things won't work out.
And yet for some reason it seems like execs think that a remake is a safe option, rather than choosing a unique script.
Of course, there are unique movies coming out all the time. Some of them are really good. Yet they don't put their advertising budgets behind them, so you might not have even heard of them.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit