Could switch be made from WCHAR* wchar, wchar_t to char* for languages with graphics instead of alphabets > in number than 256(ascii)?
Sure. An algorithm where the language was encoded and then decoded might solve the problem. However, the same potential exists for simultaneously hidden data streams containing hacked information even within the sending of bytes.
/* This won't work
If the byte of a alphabetical character is created from bits, each byte could contain more than character sent within the byte.
Therefore, to lower data transmission costs and enhance security encoder/decoder algorithms of the char set, each byte could contain two characters with languages that have lower alphabet counts.
For example,
*/
The other option is to increase the number of bytes for ASCII character and use crypto keys which regularly change during a data transmission in order to have secure data transmission. Still, the bytes per char could be modified to contain hacked data, viral and malware input.
Therefore, the better solution is to transmit data in bytes using encoder/decoder crypto keys for byte data chains and alphabet-ize graphic languages that they are transmitted in singular bytes.
That's how Steemit and the whole world could return to computing security, quickly. Making, cryptocurrency more valuable very quickly.
There is no other logical reason to continue the allowance of unsecured data transmission in the wchar, etc format except to allow for diminished individual privacy.
Where, the individual can also mean additionally group, organization, institution, system, social system or as we say in the west governments, businesses, charities, and so on.
Making, Steemit go up to $42 per steem
In the beginning, there was ASCII, and it was good.
So much of C was built around ascii.
You know, for(i=0, string[i] != null, i++) { }
so easy to iterate through strings.
And then comes wchar, and it is just a mess. Basically every language just added in one after the other.
Some is just added extra alphabet characters (â, ō) but others like Chinese are over 3000 pictographs that roughly translate to words.
The thing about ascii is it was very well designed. A and a have the same lower bits, and such.
I could easily do what you say with char, but not with wchar. I can't quite see how to make that happen easily.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Run a for loop the length other wchar.
Make the char the same length.
Cast the what to char.
Or std::wstring
And std::string
😂
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit