This is a great article. Learned lots from it and LOVE the exploration of how the "Crown" Law was incepted. I stopped at two pages of notes though as this is gonna be a massive topic to talk about on the show (hoping I can make it as a guest in time!)

Social bodies, committees, guilds etc that can administer and settle debates held in small, customizable forums are more human, superior to those courts where one enters already a victim even when defending. Why? These controlled arenas made by the Crown, for injustices against the Commonwealth and the Commonwealth's enforcers will force you into a system with rules and legislation that are predefined to such an extent that the outcome of any legal case is predefined from the outset.

Examples of Some Alternatives

1. http://committee.org/ - Committees of Protection, Correspondence and Safety of the various States United under and by the Constitution of the United States of America
2. https://www.commonlawcourt.com/ - Common Law Courts - Great Britain & International
3. https://iclcor750181.org/ - The International Common Law Court of Record on Land

The following is a combination of notes I took for my own comprehension when I was reading your post along with some discussion points or alternative solutions.

A self-driven society wont be any utopia simply because it becomes stateless and therefore, perfect. But neither could a self-driven society be expected to foster an environment where the violation of common decency and personal property and bodily rights is accepted.
Contempt towards a policing/enforcement class in a self-driven society would be non-existent because the removal, replacement or limitation of any such class is the prerogative of the normal members of society. The rights of another person are sought to be upheld and respected by all within the self-driven society.

The source and amount of economic funding behind acts of violence vary drastically when compared. The state and Statist funds their unilateral acts of violence with levies, charges and taxes imposed upon their constituents (or 'voters'). The individual or group who finds themselves driven to violence must fund their own actions and any subsequent liability or fault attributable to the same actions (if they are proven unjust, unwarranted, unnecessary).

A key weapon against the State and it's agenda of indoctrinating Communitarianism and Statism enslavement is to deny it's legitimacy. By accepting these systems as true, you have lost any presumption of their possible illegitimacy. And to this end, enslavement to the State and it's enforcers is perpetually renewed by you and your future children.

ingrained presupposition exists behind any action or violence from the state plus the State's continued oppression being of a moral and just purpose. Without initially questioning the legitimacy of such a force ruling your life, you will not question their motives.
Even the excessive use of force used by the State's enforcers is eventually accepted; you are broken through generations of being battered, dispirited and now your normal state is to cower like a beaten dog.

Eventually this Sadistic State gets so heavy handed, so cruel that their excessive force becomes morally justified in your mind: Stockholm Syndrome with your innate will to liberty, fury for freedom being the hostage is honestly the best way for a community to function as one strong, powerful and massive whole.

The state and their enforcers can not get it wrong anyway, there's no question about it. It is their job and sole reason for existing to know their systems better than you do. They can't get it wrong in their system; they know this, you don't.

Statelessness would not endure or permit the continued injustices that the State and Statist thrive upon. Being born, raised and fledged into adulthood without an overbearing Big Brother creates humans that shift responsibility onto their own actions and refuse reliance or excuse from Big Brother and His Hungry Momma.

Anarchy's mayham is wholly conjectural; the State's mayhem is undeniably, factually horrendous.

• Liberty better than Slavery
• What about responsibility being better than passing the buck?
• What about freedom to live? To live and love not just as a being born into a stateless society where liberty is law, but to take whatever liberty is required to retain freedom, defend life and love, deny and destroy enslavement?

If The Facts Scare You, Then The Problem Isn't With The Facts: It's With You & Your Enslavement to Lies

Anarchist belief systems being defined as 'crimes' by the State.
Freedom Fighters being defined as 'terrorists' by the State.

The very existence of criminal (crown) law and how it is used to sever any link between legal liability, personal responsibility and the harms or losses caused.

Difference between crime & tort
Criminal; The Crown, The State
Tort; The Common Law, Natural Justice, Precedent Cases

Judgment made by the legacy of precedent legal torts at Common Law