Appearances are always deceiving/What is really going on?

in informationwar •  7 years ago  (edited)

It seems that something is happening in free speech when according to a Freedom Outpost article that is titled "CA Judge: Twitter Can Be Sued For Falsely Advertising They Allow Free Speech". and written by  Mac Slavo.   The one thing that is for sure is it is not in the end going to be good for free speech. That is just my thoughts on this any ways. The very first claim made in the article is what the Judge said:

The judge said that Twitter’s policy  of banning users “at any time, for any reason or for no reason” may  constitute an “unconscionable contract” for a company which advertises  free speech.

Source : Freedom Outpost

This is actually what the News Media have been doing for years.

Presenting themselves as news and than writing in there terms of service that they exist for entertainment purposes or some other artifice. The unspoken claim being that they do this for legal purposes. I have always known that, yeah the legal purpose is to not be news. So what else is said in the article that is of interest here:

“This ruling has massive implications for the platform going forward,” said Noah Peters, Jared Taylor’s lawyer. “this is the first time that a social media company’s argument that it can censor user speech has been rejected by a court.” 

Source : Freedom Outpost

When I first read this my instincts told me that this applies to other social media like Facebook and YouTube. Why  do I think this? Well how is it we know about what is going on in the world, but by this special social media club and Google. Sure enough I find out that my instincts are correct When I read:

Twitter employees have also been caught on camera boasting about their actions to keep conservatives and Trump supporters off the  platform.  They also, along with YouTube, have scrubbed videos that do  not align with the government and mainstream media’s “official narrative” with regards to incidents such as the Parkland, Florida school shooting.

Source : Freedom Outpost

Alex Thomas wrote :" Twitter Caught Trying To Silence James O’Keefe After He Exposed Their Conservative Censorship Regime" but for some reason I couldn't get the link to stick.


Then at the bottom of the article my instincts where further verified by the following claims.

Twitter’s double standards can be seen in the way it handles complaints of abuse against conservatives and individuals linked to conservatives. But it isn’t just Twitter who is attempting to censor and suppress free speech. YouTubeGoogle, and Facebook are  on the front lines of the fight for totalitarianism by silencing those with whom they disagree, much like the Nazis of Hitler’s regime.

Source : SHFT.com CENSORSHIP: Facebook Will Ramp Up ‘News Suppression’ Ahead Of 2018 Midterms

By  Mac Slavo.  

 Source : SHFT.com CONFIRMED: Google Protects Big Pharma By CENSORING Natural Health News

By  Mac Slavo.  

Source : SHFT.com : Facebook Suspends Conservative Comedian For Posting Abusive Messages Sent To Him

By Mac Slavo. 

Source Breitbart by Allum Bokhari

So we now have the target list of companies whose existence makes it possible for the regular person to communicate across the ponds. Yeah I get that they are claiming that this particular club of social media is somehow infringing upon our free and open speech across the pond and even within nations. However I wonder at this, mainly because we do know that a lot of things that are happening in the world are not right. How we know this is from the wide spread use of this apparently special club of social media and Google. 

Knowing from experience that the exposure is not desired and the elite would like to be  known as other then scumbags, the question often comes to mind how are they going to get the perception of kings and Queens back? The fact that there are really very few writer investigators on this makes it clear that this could just be a story designed to get the regular person behind getting rid of these leaks. For I am sure of one thing. 

They are going to try like hell to get that perception back.


All photo's are from Pixabay.com I am not responsible for if you think, how you think, what you think or do. You Are! If you like my content consider up voting and a follow. Peace. 

Some things you can do to help your crypto and steemit experiences below!


A way to make free BTC and 4.08% interest in a BTC savings account.

Play games for BTC

Interested in joining or supporting the Information War? 

Use tag  #informationwar to post your own stories about the lies and propaganda being pushed on the public.

@informationwar will up vote posts worthy of the cause.  

Join the discord: https://discord.gg/JsXbzFM chat with like minded individuals like myself and share your articles to receive additional support.  

Delegating Steem Power:   Another way you can support the cause is to delegate SP to @informationwar

Delegate 25 SP  

Delegate 50 SP  

Delegate 100 SP Note: remember to keep around 50SP in your account so you don't run into any bandwidth problems.  

How to delegate SP, join the fan base and more:   https://steemit.com/informationwar/@truthforce/you-can-make-a-difference-join-the-informationwar-and-help-support-others-today  

Find out more about the Information War. Click Banner!

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Still comes down to knowing the difference between legal and lawful. What one says in accordance with our right to free speech is always lawful but may not be legal - in most Crown countries. It then comes down to jurisdiction, whether the oppressors have jurisdiction over you to move an administrative "legal" claim against you for what has been said and we know that all "legal" claims removes our private rights - including our right to free speech.

Lawful is the bigger bubble jurisdiction. If it is not lawful it cannot be legal. One thing is for sure many of the officials around the world are not lawful. The thing is that each person has a personal Jurisdiction, which supersedes the de facto jurisdiction and that is exactly where they are not lawful, and criminal. The only thing to do is organize under common law. They are organized. It is high time the people be organized too.

Curated for #informationwar (by @openparadigm)
Relevance: Free Speech and Social Media
Our Purpose