I feel bad already !!! I am sorry but I can't forbid people puttin chemical psychoactive / addictive / "drugs" or conscouness altering substance in their bodies...

in informationwar •  4 years ago 

I am sorry. It's their bodies. I would go as far as say if you don't have the mean to pee and shit and sweat safetly your shit, it's denied to you. and that's what I like about regulations. it's possible to DENY to some, for example YOUR KIDS, while allowing adult to dispose of their own body the way they see fit.

However I am in full support to spend my taxes in PURELY VOLUNTARY HELP SYSTEM FOR THOSE SEEKING TO LEAVE THE ARTIFICIAL REALMS.

and you know in warfare, it can be super useful to use consciousness and sensory temporary drugs... I bet the nazi laws were against cannabis, while at the same time they were all pumped on captagon and co... and certainly were churning their fair share of synthetic or even natural opioids... as nethanyahoo, most depise heroin until they need it... and then, "a God send" if I may remember the exact quote.

a good read :

critical part : "The "war on consciousness" initially centered on the war on drugs – with the end goal of an international police state. The author and researcher explained that in order to achieve this ultimate goal, humanity's perspective must be restricted and prohibited from moving beyond the socio-economic and political realities. "

full on not formated :).

A Waking Times editor pointed out that censorship is now the new battleground in the consciousness war. In a Feb. 15 op-ed, the outlet's editor Dylan Charles said consciousness plays a big role in the conversation regarding censorship done hand-in-hand by the government and Big Tech. Charles first wrote the piece in August 2018, unaware that his opinion piece would become relevant almost three years later. The Waking Times editor emphasized the importance of "digging deep with open eyes" and letting "friendly and unfriendly truths" into one's perspective in his article. "In order to make the best choices for ourselves, this view must be as broad and as complete as possible," Charles remarked. He cited the idea of a "war on consciousness," a concept introduced in 2013 by Graham Hancock. The "war on consciousness" initially centered on the war on drugs – with the end goal of an international police state. The author and researcher explained that in order to achieve this ultimate goal, humanity's perspective must be restricted and prohibited from moving beyond the socio-economic and political realities. Hancock suggested that people must be allowed to seek altered states of consciousness. This drive, when followed, is necessary for humanity to continue to evolve. He suggested a number of ways to reach this higher state – such as breathing exercises, meditation, fasting, hypnosis, rhythmic music, dance and plant medicines. Hancock put emphasis on the latter as "the most effective and efficient means available to mankind" in reaching a higher realm of consciousness. Charles subsequently mentioned that a new offensive in the consciousness war has emerged, this time in the domain of information awareness. "When a group of people … conspires to deliberately restrict access to [viewpoints], opinions, ideas, personalities and information, then [the group is] engaged in a struggle to control others' perception of the world," he said. The Waking Times editor remarked that the group's ultimate goal is to "shut down imagination" and "control [people's] consciousness of the world" shared by everyone. Doing so lets them herd everyone else onto the same rules under the guise of "equality." Charles ended his piece by reiterating the value of personal sovereignty of mind and spirit. He explained that "it is precisely this inner freedom and fearlessness that makes one impossible to control."

http://natural3jytxrhh5wqmpcz67yumyptr7pn2c52hppvn3vanmqzjlkryd.onion/2021-02-28-waking-times-censorship-new-front-consciousness-war.html

@naturalnews @healthranger :) long lives to donkeys ! may the grass they eat be always the tastiest !

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

and more importanly I have bigger problem, a nuke plant almost blew up in texas... do you get it muppets what it would meant? no, I guess, prefer to arrest little people discovering the creation... pfff...

however I am totally against foreigners using psywarfare / ads / social structures to promote a specific warfare based on drugs like china was victim off. I consider it a case of nuclear retaliation, once the origin is confirmed, wiping all and everything known to the enemies... all, mercyless.

is it retaliatory or offensive? who cares, they won't be able to discuss it.