Prophets vs Statesmen according to Henry KissingersteemCreated with Sketch.

in kissinger •  7 years ago 

image-20160808-18027-ylz8lg.jpg

“[T]he claims of the prophet,” he [Kissinger] writes, “are a counsel of perfection, and perfection implies uniformity. [But] utopias are not achieved except by a process of leveling and dislocation which must erode all patterns of obligation … [while] to rely entirely on the moral purity of an individual is to abandon the possibility of restraint.”

maurice_harold_macmillan.jpg

Against the prophet, Kissinger sides with the statesman, who “must remain forever suspicious of these efforts, not because he enjoys the pettiness of manipulation, but because he must be prepared for the worst contingency.”

CroppedImage680680-Michael-Ignatieff-Preferred-Photo-2015-web.jpg

Part of the statesman’s tragedy is that he will always be in the minority, for “it is not balance which inspires men but universality, not security but immortality.”80 People yearn for transcendence; that makes them susceptible to prophets. Moreover, people feel a strong attachment to their own national definition of “justice.”

from Niall Ferguson's biography of Kissinger
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1480522767/ref=cm_sw_r_tw_dp_x_FolgAbGRKZ7HZ

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Congratulations @petrmisan! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

Award for the number of posts published
You published 4 posts in one day

Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here

If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

By upvoting this notification, you can help all Steemit users. Learn how here!

The politics of the stateman seems closer to an anarchist viewpoint, although with true anarchism there would be no government.