RE: great new philosophy tube video

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

great new philosophy tube video

in lgbt •  6 years ago 

So where's your argument for transphobia after watching the video?

maybe I am totally wrong

Well, at least you consider it.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  
  ·  6 years ago (edited)

I would love to have a discussion but I will chose not to with you because it feels it's gonna be a total waste of time for both of us. The reasoning behind this is that I give you thorough long replies and all you do is just isolate the parts that fit your narrative without adressing any other of my points.

Have a fun day :)

  ·  6 years ago (edited)

Sorry, which of your arguments for joining this thread with a useless comment attacking the poster personally (with one unchangeable and one false claim) did I ignore?
Well, never mind, you started your engagement in this thread giving bogus reasons why you won't discuss seriously, makes sense to end it the same way.

You realized why the comments were flagged, that's more than I would have expected. I don't intend to change your opinions.

  ·  6 years ago (edited)

Again, you reply to only to what fits your narrative. Ok , let's be specific. Can you tell me what part of this comment contains an insult?

You are a trans person that loves Stalin. Having any kind of meaningful discussion with you is pointless, much like having a discussion with a nazi Jew.

P.S.: Phobia is a Greek word from φοβια which means "fear of something". Nobody is afraid of trans people. You can trust me on this one cause guess what? I am Greek!

P.S: resteemed for awareness

You won't find any. If you plan to come back with something like "i flagged because it doesn't deserve a vote" I explained you why I upvoted it right from the start. This is again something you ignored.

Please be specific. And by specific I mean something like "The word x is an insult because blah" or "The combination of words x and x is an insult"

  ·  6 years ago (edited)

I assume you used the combination trans and Stalin loving because of what you later said, Stalin would've killed her.
Without that explanation it's just offensive.
Now factor in that you're wrong about the political views of the person you talk to. What remains is you can't discuss because she's trans.

Saying that transphobia doesn't exist is not arguing the arguments of the video at all. Maybe you should watch it, he uses Greek philosophy ;)

  ·  6 years ago (edited)

Is is offensive to say "it's pointless to try and have a discussion with a Nazi Jew" without explaining why? I think some stuff are self explanatory. As for the "you are wrong about the political views of the person", check my previous comment to you.

And I didn't say it's pointless to argue with the arguments of the videos or the guy in the video. It's pointless to argue with her.

  ·  6 years ago (edited)

If that person may be a Jew (or not, for that matter) , but does not consider himself a Nazi - yes, it is.

Even if it were an actual Nazi Jew, just don't engage at all. Each to their own, that's what this platform is about.

  ·  6 years ago (edited)

Nope, this not what the platform is about. I am free to engage whoever, however I want for whatever reason I want. Much as you are free to engage, debate, mute and flag me for whatever the reason 😂

As I said, then don't. Others might disagree and expect a discussion about the content below the post.