I hate what the current Conservative government has been doing just as much as anyone else who hates war, paedophilia, false flags, funding terrorists, defrauding of the people and being lied to about practically everything. Still, despite how awful this Conservative government is, here is why i will not vote for Labour / Jeremy Corbyn on principle. This is the complete reason why.
I ask: Does Jeremy Corbyn suggest a morally acceptable solution to the problem that is the current Conservative government?
I answer: No, he would like to continue the established (inherent) government policy of state-sanctioned theft and violent denial of our natural rights, in direct violation of the Non-Aggression Principle.
If Jeremy Corbyn is elected - which i think is highly unlikely for all sorts of reasons aside from how many votes he'll get - he will still be using the state structure to violently have his will enforced.
The Non-Aggression Principle constitutes part of eternal Natural Law, and is explained by Murray Rothbard in this way: "No one may threaten or commit violence ('aggress') against another man's person or property. Violence may be employed only against the man who commits such violence; that is, only defensively against the aggressive violence of another. In short, no violence may be employed against a nonaggressor." This is a principle that i fully subscribe to, hence i will not be supporting Corbyn on principle. Principle means something which comes first. Principles, by definition, come before fear of the consequences, convenience, hedging, tactics or anything else. For some people chosing whether or not to do the right thing isn't just like chosing a bag of crisps or a new jumper, it's a way of being. Do you have principles, or are you a voter?