RE: Tortured "complexity"

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Tortured "complexity"

in liberty •  6 years ago 

Reality is simple too. The strong subjugate the weak. So is genetics. Slaves have been hybridized to select suitable traits.

You are free to begin your anarchy utopia immediately. Nothing to stop you. Of course you will be immediately subjugated by a long list of embedding groups that employ more sophisticated methods to out-compete anarchy. Perhaps if you stop trying to think of governance and social structures as a cartoon, you can move beyond simple ideas.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

You seem to be confusing social structures with anti-social structures (government). Government is the opposite of society, in every instance. Good trick they played getting people to confuse the two, though.

Anarchy won't lead to Utopia. Nothing will. In fact, your whole argument is the long-discredited "But wouldn't warlords take over?" objection.

Cling to theft and aggression if that's what you prefer. I won't stop you. All I insist is that you stay out of my way.

Blog pic 2.jpg

No.

Since you linked to Mises, I'll explain a property of markets that you won't find from him. It comes from network and game theory. 'Free markets' are not the stable state of markets. They are a transitory state of immature, developing market. Given enough time all markets converge to direct or collusive monopolies.

Since talking to you is mostly just an exercise where you randomly list bumper-sticker ideas with little understanding and then you misconstrue positions into some low-effort cliche so you can emit canned responses, there is no further value communicating with you.

A monopoly is impossible to maintain without the State. I would explain the reasons, but since you'd prefer to run away...