You have probably noticed this, but in case you haven't: you can't win.
No matter what you talk about someone will say you are using the word wrong; even that you are a fool or a tool for using the word as you do.
From freedom and liberty, to government and state, anarchist and statist, and beyond. I've found this to be the case anytime I discuss a topic which is important and controversial (along the statist/anarchist divide, especially).
Which is why I try to make sure to explain how I use a word, and why I use it the way I'm using it.
But you still can't win. Because then you'll be accused of making words mean what you want them to mean instead of what they "really" mean. Even worse is the crime of coining your own words.
But, I don't care.
You can't win... if you play by their rules.
To me, winning is living in liberty. At least as much as possible when surrounded by people who believe in, and support, aggressive institutions which insist you aren't allowed to opt out. They are the real losers, no matter what they believe about themselves.
The fact that they try to redefine "winning" so it's exclusive to them doesn't change that.
--
I'm taking tomorrow off for personal reasons.
Thank you for helping support KentforLiberty.com.
Donations and subscriptions are always appreciated!
Just had a conversation about this tonight. Cheryl said "Two people have told me that I will never make it in the commercial world, and from both of them I took it as a compliment."
Its money, or friends. No one seemingly has both.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit