RE: I love you all. Yes, you. Separation, scarcity, fear, anger, conflict, is not real.

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

I love you all. Yes, you. Separation, scarcity, fear, anger, conflict, is not real.

in life •  8 years ago 

To bad it does not tell people HOW? Anyway it is as simple as ...when asked your NAME...."IAM the Witness"
to YOU aiding and abetting identity theft, fraud, and extortion upon ME A TRESPASS OF MEGA PROPORTIONS......and all of the ignorant minions (MEANING PUBLIC SERVICES STAFF) WORKING FOR Rome will IMMEDIATELY CEASE AND DESIST!
Trespass is an area of criminal law or tort law broadly divided into three groups: trespass to the person, trespass to chattels and trespass to land.
Trespass to the person historically involved six separate trespasses: threats, assault, battery, wounding, mayhem, and maiming.[1] Through the evolution of the common law in various jurisdictions, and the codification of common law torts, most jurisdictions now broadly recognize three trespasses to the person: assault, which is "any act of such a nature as to excite an apprehension of battery";[2] battery, "any intentional and unpermitted contact with the plaintiff's person or anything attached to it and practically identified with it";[2] and false imprisonment, the "unlaw[ful] obstruct[ion] or depriv[ation] of freedom from restraint of movement".[3]
Trespass to chattels, also known as trespass to goods or trespass to personal property, is defined as "an intentional interference with the possession of personal property … proximately caus[ing] injury".[4] Trespass to chattel does not require a showing of damages. Simply the "intermeddling with or use of … the personal property" of another gives cause of action for trespass.[5][6] Since CompuServe Inc. v. Cyber Promotions,[7] various courts have applied the principles of trespass to chattel to resolve cases involving unsolicited bulk e-mail and unauthorized server usage.[8][9][10][11]
Trespass to land is today the tort most commonly associated with the term trespass; it takes the form of "wrongful interference with one's possessory rights in [real] property".[12] Generally, it is not necessary to prove harm to a possessor's legally protected interest; liability for unintentional trespass varies by jurisdiction. "[A]t common law, every unauthorized entry upon the soil of another was a trespasser"; however, under the tort scheme established by the Restatement of Torts, liability for unintentional intrusions arises only under circumstances evincing negligence or where the intrusion involved a highly dangerous activity.[13]

https://mainerepublicemailalert.com/.../the-big-switch.../
The Big Switch – An Open Accusation of Worldwide Fraud
Judge Anna von Reitz When I was a little girl I lived on an old homestead farm that was bisected pretty much down the middle by US Highway 12. Back in the days before the Interstate Highway Syst…
MAINEREPUBLICEMAILALERT.COM
https://mainerepublicemailalert.com/.../the-big-switch.../
The Big Switch – An Open Accusation of Worldwide Fraud
Judge Anna von Reitz When I was a little girl I lived on an old homestead farm that was bisected pretty much down the middle by US Highway 12. Back in the days before the Interstate Highway Syst…
MAINEREPUBLICEMAILALERT.COM

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

I don't follow you. Is this a spam/bot message? What do all those trespass laws and legal issues have to do with my post? :P