After 13 years I have finally watched a "war" movie.

in life •  7 years ago  (edited)

No, I didn't watch one of those action packed comedies where one character defeats an entire brigade, or two, or even three!
No, it wasn't one of those "Hollywood" specials, it was a movie about a man, his life, his dilemmas, his inner conflicts, knowing what he was doing was right, yet his hatred for war growing with every day he spent in war.

The movie is called "Sniper" it was directed by none other than one of the all time legends Clint Eastwood.

At the very beginning of the movie I was ready to switch the program/channel to see what else was on the TV, then all of a sudden the scene jumps from a war scene to a scene where a boy and his dad are out hunting and the boy shoots a deer and is praised by his father.

So I decided to watch the movie to see where it all leads to.

As the movie went on, I saw a scene that took me back in time, where a young man and his partner are watching the twin towers go down in flames, although in the movie it shows one of the towers going down and then the reactions of this young couple. This was maybe the only indirect mention of why it ever came to a war in Iraq, which was originally a continuation of the war in Afghanistan. Although, this is how some have seen this scene, what I saw was a personal reaction, anger, fear, disbelief, shock in the young couples reaction as they hug each other.

So the young man makes his decision to join the military, a person who disliked water joined the Navy SEALS, the training, the willpower not to give up and the determination to go out and do the best that he can in the hope to ensure nothing like the Twin Towers ever happens again.

Saving lives by taking lives, that is the job of a sniper. Simple as that. No two ways about it, any and all detailed definitions of this job all just go into all the details that are summarized in this sentence I just gave here.

So I kept on watching the movie, I didn't notice any hundreds of US flags, except for one or two during the movie and then in the funeral procession at the end of the movie. Just a little thing I noticed, or maybe failed to notice, as I was concentrating on the main character in the movie, his feelings, his dilemmas, his emotions and so on, so much so that I actually ignored some of the Hollywood within the movie.

I'm going to jump around a little here, as did Clint Eastwood in the movie, because I cannot explain what all I wish to say about the movie by just going through it scene by scene and talking about "a movie". My post here is not just about "a movie" it is about what I saw in the movie and why I managed to watch it all the way to the end.

A young man, brought up in a family that was simple in its ways, christian morals with what was back many years considered to be a normal and acceptable level of strictness in the family. Where the mother was the mother and the father was "the law" in the household. Now that to many may seem a little extreme in todays day and age, but the fact is that is how it was once upon a time in many house holds.

One of the scenes got me, got me bad, it was a scene where a pet dog was playing with one of the children while this man was home on R&R, and when he saw that the dog was apparently going to hurt the child he ripped out his belt, just like his strict dad did and he wanted to give the dog a good old belting. He didn't, only because his wife called his name out. The movie didn't show any scenes of the dog playing like this with the kids, which in fact depicted the fact that the main character had never seen this before, as he was deployed to the theater in Iraq and wasn't home. It also showed how his wifes voice was probably the only voice he could hear when in the heat of the moment. In many a scene he calls her on the good old sat phone, which was the only form of comms that were out there back in 2003 and a good chunk of 2004. In every one of his calls he wants to hear her voice, a way to get back to reality, to make some sense out of all the things that are going around him.

One of the lines in the movie which I knew, even though I had never watched it before was ".....despicable evil. That's what we were fighting in Iraq......" and if memory serves me right, something along the lines of what I have said many a time, "....that’s evil like I've never seen before....."

There is an entire act in the movie in which the spooks (DIA / CIA) arrange for a payment to be made to one of the locals in Iraq for information. This was the one and only scene where "civilian" contractors were involved. No matter how short this entire act and relevant scenes may have been, it depicted the truth about how "civilian" contractors were often used for things that The Government could not even "touch". The line that I laughed at was "....the bag is to be handled by a civilian contractor....." referring to the bag with the money. I mean, how much more graphic does it get in defining the roles of various "civilian" contractors in theater. Where The Government can't afford to get "involved" send out the "civilian contractors", LOVE IT!
Finally a movie in which "civilian contractors" are mentioned!

I couldn't believe it, and the best part of all, it said it all, in a few sentences and seconds of scenes, just telling it all as it was without all the Hollywood BS, maybe a little dramatization, but not really all that much when I think about it, because the movie squeezed in an entire lifetime of one man into one movie!

I don't care what anyone thinks but I can't see myself depicting a persons entire life in a movie, damn I can't even convey what all of the little things about the movie actually got me watching it all the way to the end, but here I am, "x" words later still trying to find the words to describe all the emotions.

When I really get down to the little things in the movie that got me watching it and not flicking the channel it was the "one liners" as the blokes spoke among themselves.

I guess that kept me in the movie and then later on the things that went on at home, the fact that he felt exiled in his own home, only a change in scenery and after talking with others did he get to a stage where he could move on with his life.

The ending was sad, I didn't expect it, like I said, I don't watch or read about "war" movies. The ones i watched in my youth are the ones I watched and now I guess this movie too. Although this movie is about a man, not a war. About what a war does to a man and not what a man does in a war.

I think I will end this post here, those who can understand what I am saying understood it, to those who didn't i apologize, never was much of a writer.

Thanks for reading and the next time you watch this movie I hope some of my words here, the things I saw in this movie may be things you see too, especially the part about the "civilian" contractors, that is rare out there no one mentions these guys (at least as far as I noticed), yet you would be surprised at just how many there are out there and what all their responsibilities and duties may involve. Many a time things that could never be predicted in and job contract or scope of work, yet the job has to get done, one way or another.

PS. Everyone is green out there, that is a US Marines motto, something endorsed throughout this movie and everyone is just a human being, another thing that is endorsed in this movie. Had to add this little piece of info here, otherwise this post wouldn't be complete.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

We at Community News reckon Sniper was a brilliant movie Jack, based on a real life hero - and some of us were in tears at the end. (Not SirKnight of course - he wouldn't cry during a movie)

Great recap of the story.

COMMUNITY NEWS

There might have been a tear or two Community News, like Jack, SirKnight was not expecting that ending at all.

Great post @jackmiller.

SK.

Emotions and crying are normal, so they tell me.

Can't wait to go fishing back home where everything is normal.

He was a hero to the families of the guys who came back alive thanks to him doing his job.

To his family he was who he was, a husband, father, son, brother.

To the public watching, some saw a hero, some an ordinary man who became a victim of war in a warzone that is full of evils and immorality that most westerners can never understand.

So, no matter what anyone thinks about the person, or the movie, to me it was a war movie that I managed to watch all the way to the end for the first time on some 13 odd years.

I don't judge, I try to understand. Guess that is what I learned in life. As such I just call things as I see them, no gift wrapping!

No, I didn't watch one of those action packed comedies where one character defeats an entire brigade, or two, or even three!

Are you referring to Chuck Norris The Great movies? LOL..

OK OK we'll say Rambo...

Anyway, that was a great movie, I enjoyed watching it as well.

Hahaaha, The only movie from the "Rambo" series that was worth watching was First Blood, I remember watching it on video at my brothers place, think it was like 1984 ..... talk about flash backs... I remember a few quotes from that movie now that I mentioned it:

"....they drew first blood...."

"civilian life is nothing, out in the field we had a code of honour, you watch my back I watch yours...."

"....he kept pushing...."

Man, talk about flash backs, everything from the bean bag that I was sitting/laying on, to his cat laying next to me and his TV and Video recorder under it....... even remember the carpet in the house.....

Great review jack, but I can't vote without at least mentioning that a lot of kyle's story is fiction ..

This was the first time i watched a "war" movie in many many many years, I try to avoid the tabloids on "war" as I found that they just don't agree with me.

As far as this movie goes, I have to say that it is in fact "Anti war", very clearly makes it a point to show how war affects people in BAD ways.

As per the "hero" topic, I really am not one to judge who is or who isn't a hero to whom.
One that kidnaps a family and sends the father/husband out to commit suicide in a car/truck bomb may be a hero to some, on the other side, someone who pops that victim of war in a car/truck full of fuel and sawdust and what ever other explosives may be a hero to others.

IDK what contemplates the idea of a "hero".

As for the book, it is interesting to read here in the link that a lot of it was "fiction", I guess his family can sleep easier knowing that their husband/dad ensured that his book be listed as fiction and that the people who put a price on his head don't automatically just forward that reward money for his family.

I haven't read the book, plan on doing so one day, but as far as the movie goes, it got my attention and all respect to Clint Eastwood who managed to show the world how people change after being in various theaters in which crazy people are doing all sorts of things that no civilian could ever imagine.

What is totally immoral to you and me and other people of the West in many cases is acceptable in other "cultures" and "sects" out there in this world.

Things that we will never be able to understand.

Add a war zone to this and it is inevitable that people change, once you face these evils out there face to face, you can never be the same, never.

Not to mention all the people who were physically disabled due to the evils of war.

This is the message of this movie, at least that is the message I saw, no hero or heroes, just victims of war in a theater full of evil.

I really enjoyed this movie.

I'm gonna watch it :)

Thank you, i am gonna to watch the movie

I enjoyed this movie as well. Movies directed by Clint Eastward tend to be quite good and not over top.

If you want to watch a good war movie that is realistic, you should watch 'Full Metal Jacket'. The first half of the movie in particular is really good.

"Boot camp" is and always will be the same in nature no matter where or when it is/was!
Watched that movie ages ago, haven't watched it since, just not into the "war" movies, they tend to stress me out too much.

good write up mate, and it was a very good movie. Not overly "hollywood". I had read the book as well before seeing the movie and before he died.

Might read the book once we're all back in Australia and settled down.

Like my title of the post says in translation "not for me", just haven't got the patience to sit through it. Plus I hate the BS in most of the Hollywood stuff out there.

& from my experiences, the written word rarely manages to relay all the details, but I think that this may be an exception for me, guess I can fill in some gaps on my own, so I will buy the book, just won't read it until I'm ready to get into it.

Congratulations @jackmiller! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

You published a post every day of the week

Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here

If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

By upvoting this notification, you can help all Steemit users. Learn how here!

loved how this movie was based on actual events...