It seems to be human nature doesn't it? Not being able to admit when we're wrong...
I don't know... I've never really had that problem. Ever since I can remember, I've been able to look at any given situation and either stand my ground on facts and logic, or admit, "Welp, I fucked up. You're right. I'm wrong." It's never bothered me to be wrong. Sometimes we're going to be wrong. It doesn't make you a bad person, or any less of a man (or woman). Why not just admit it, and move past it? But a recent exchange with a fellow Steemian made me think about the situation.
The Background
I'm not going to throw the guy under the bus and name names... there's honestly just no point to it. But he did make the unfortunate decision to re-post some garbage viral newsfeed from earlier in the year that was proven by every news station to be false, err Fake News, as it would be called now-a-days, without doing his own research. Had he taken just 2 minutes of his time, he would know that the story he was regurgitating was completely inaccurate and filled with "journalistic" narratives based on statistics they knew nothing about.
I left a very respectful, albeit straight to the point, response to his article... "This is completely inaccurate and really misleading..." I went on to state the facts of the case and how the article he was reposting was previously verified to be inaccurate. What I expected was completely different than what I received. He didn't back track his statements, or the article. He doubled down and got defensive. But why? The facts were (and are) clear.
This made me think... we do some people have so much trouble admitting when they're wrong?
The Psychology Behind It
So why can't people admit when they're wrong? Because of Cognitive Dissonance.
Cognitive Dissonance is the mixed feeling of having inconsistent thoughts, beliefs, or attitudes. It's "knowing that you're right" despite overwhelming evidence, logic, and reason piled up against you. It's believing something in your heart, but thinking something differently in your mind. In the above situation, after being presented with the evidence and the facts, he knew he was wrong. Although he knew he was wrong, he wanted be right. He wanted to be right so bad that he would double down on falsehoods and BS narratives that he created on his own, vague arguments, and finally taking his ball and walking away; instead of just admitting that he was wrong.
Unfortunately, random articles posted on Steemit aren't the only place that we see this. We see it everywhere... especially in politics. Whether you're a Democrat or a Republican, you can find videos of supporters of the opposite party answering questions that they believe to be in conjunction with their party line, only to be dumbfounded when the interviewer tells them otherwise.
So where am I going with this?
Just a simple question... At what point will people start thinking for themselves? At what point will people get tired of defending someone else's ideas, work, or actions? At what point will people have some integrity and start taking initiative for their own believes and put them in action?
Thanks for making this post. It's a big issue that we see everywhere. I think it has a lot to do with the strong culture of competition: We want to always win. But that's not how we grow. We grow by learning from our mistakes. I think we all need a lot more practice learning to lose arguments. It's important to be able to stop and say, "You know what? You're right. I hadn't thought about it that way, and now I need to rethink my stance." Unfortunately, that's not how people like to operate.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I agree 100%. The culture of competition definitely makes sense to be a driving factor in people's unwillingness to accept defeat, no matter how petty the situation. And like you said.... we can only grow by learning from our mistakes.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
To be fair, if you start your response with "Your post is completely inaccurate", you are almost guaranteed to get a negative response. Like you said, the natural human reaction is to defend oneself when "attacked", even in a harmless constructive-criticism way.
I try to use the compliment sandwich - say something nice at the start and end, put the critique in the middle. Some people just want to force you to agree with them, no matter what you say they respond with a passionate defense of their ideas - perhaps not logical, but passionate - in these cases, I try to just step out of the conversation.
It's easier said than done to accept criticism well - I know I have a lot more work to do.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You're absolutely right. Coming off so bluntly probably didn't work well in my favor. Being more tactful and going with the compliment sandwich definitely would have helped my case. Thanks for the input!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit