I've been wondering if Prince Charles was just an ordinary man, would that 19-year-old Diana marry him knowing he had another love? In an open video of Diana, she once said about the day of her big wedding: "My heart is as calm as death, and I feel like a lamb to be slaughtered. "
She really can not be so poor, no one sent her to the case board, is her own wish: if she refused, who would force her to stand in the church and say to a man: "I do." But can you blame her? Diana couldn't tell the difference between loving the man and loving the crown, but then she had a lot of chances: when their marriage was still alive, she could choose to divorce, but she was reluctant and stubborn to retain the title of princess. Maybe she felt she had paid too much for the title, so she could not lose the honor.
Don't blame women for their attitude towards love. Apart from the seven fairies, few women will fall in love with Dong Yong, who sells herself as a slave. But for ordinary women, we expect to get added value from love. Women often say to themselves that it's better to marry a good man who loves them, but there won't be such a cheap thing in the world. Beautiful as Diana, not to mention others? It's hard for a woman to tell from the beginning whether to love someone or to love the life that a person provides. Often listen to women talk about what kind of man can marry or not, they will often pout their lips and say that those who are unsuccessful and have no economic ability can not marry, they lack the demeanor and heart of the rich, in fact, women themselves are not like this, in reality, there are several women who say to fame and wealth: "It's no big deal! "
When they were young and ignorant, they often wondered why rich women cheated, especially in feudal society. Once found, they will be killed in the sinking pond, but why do women risk their lives to do such things?
Is there pure love in the world? What makes Romeo and Juliet live and die together? What made the Duke of Windsor abandon his country and throne? Are they really childish or impulsive? I believe not: love is an irreplaceable feeling. You can't feel the happiness of love unless you are with the person you love. But the added value of love can be replaced: if you want to acquire wealth through love, you don't think you need to be with wealth providers when you get rich, especially when you grow up and build your own wealth kingdom, you can't stand the man who first provided you with wealth.
There are many things worth pursuing in the world, but only love can be tasted by sincere love: there may be all kinds of bitterness and bitterness, and there are many ways to get it, not necessarily by marrying a person. In this case, why should people set such a high threshold for their love? I am afraid not that you are too demanding for love, but that the people you enter your threshold are all people who have nothing to do with love: because true love does not need a threshold; love is two-way love, wishful thinking, and not picking tomatoes in the free market, but to find the most reasonable price-performance ratio.
The favorite question between lovers is probably what do you love me? Nobody ever said that I love your wealth, my family, and the life you can provide me. Why? Because we all know it's a terrible sight. So far, the most touching answer I have heard is an English sentence: I love you not because you are, but because of the love when I love with you.
Love pays for the most moving love. Do you love the love you love?
There is no right or wrong in the world of love, only love and dislove.